Why is it so hard for you to accept that evolution is fact?

It didn't evolve from nothing.

Know what a singularity is?

Evolution should certainly not be taught as "fact". It has been demonstrated that science cannot "prove" anything. Evolution is a poor theory at best. Science should be approached with an open mind and as little bias as possible.

Well, yeah.

Sure.

the thing is, it's that evolution isn't the only science-related theory out there, which, yeah, proves your point.

How could God have been created in the 1st place?

The scientific hurdles that must be crossed for a naturalistic universe to exist take far more faith to believe than that there is an omnipotent being who created it.

Creationist scientists are often rejected as pseudo-scientific by evolutionists. It seems that they have an agenda against God's existence.

I think the most plausible one is that there was a previous universe, similar in size to ours, that collapsed into a singularity. It was like that for a long time before expanding again and creating another Big Bang.

And so, the loop repeats infinitely.

HOW WOULD an eye have evolvoed so perfectly? give me proof. and who created the matter in the big bang then? If there is no creator, life would not be here. It takes for faith to be an atheist.

That's not even science, it's just speculation with no evidence to back it up other than the need for an origin. It's not testable, observable, and it makes no predictions. It's more like philosophy

Sorry, hap. I'm not very well adapted to that role. Challenge accepted, though.

Materialists don't care where the energy for the Big Bang came from because it's not observable to us at the present. They're concerned about what is in our range of observation which, at present, lets us have a decent idea of what the universe might have been like about 380,000 years after the Big Bang but not before that.

One thing that creationists and evolutionists agree on is that living things are very well adapted to their environments. Nature is a cause for wonder and a source of wisdom whether you're religious or not. Don't let the controversy prevent you from seeing every part of the world with an open mind. Nature is "designed" to persist for eons. It's the only thing we have to learn from, and its design is the standard for perfection. Whichever perspective gives you the most curiosity to understand nature is the one you should follow. If either perspective leads you to dismiss nature as something that's insignificant or incomprehensible, you should reject that point of view because it won't allow you to see the wonder that is the world.

There are certainly very qualified creationist scientists, and just think of where science would be without Christians: Galileo, Johannes Kepler, Isaac Newton, James Clerk Maxwell, Michael Faraday, Robert Boyle, and Louis Pasteur just to name a few.

I know.

That's what I believe, at least. There are many other theories that other people believe.

Tell me, how did God come to be, then?

In that case, then God would have to have a creator.

Who was it?

This argument comes from a misunderstanding of Biblical theology. God does not need a creator; God has always existed. He is omnipotent, omniscient, and all-powerful, infinite, and he exists outside of our laws of causality.

And the same with the Big Bang.

We can't see clearly what was there before it happened.

Neither can you see how God was created.

The Big Bang, for us atheists and non-religious people, is the God of our world. It is the creation of everything, the only reason why we exist.

In my POV, that "God" still exists.

It exists in the form of the entire Universe.

God was not created. But you can't say that science supports the Big Bang when the Big Bang is much more philosophical than scientific. Accepting the Big Bang as philosophical isn't consistent with an evolutionary and materialistic view of the universe.

If this is truly what you believe then you have made evolution a religion, you do believe in a "god" of sorts, and calling yourself non-religious isn't even true. If you are willing to accept the Big Bang despite the scientific impossibilities, you must have more faith than a Christian.

Multiple scientific studies are looking through history(more recently, they started looking through electromagnetic waves) to see exactly what happened 13.8 billion years ago.

Also, everything has to have a beginning.

Wait, hol up.

This leads to a paradox.

In both cases, there's a paradox.

If I told you that the Big Bang and the past Universe theory were true, then that matter would have to be created.

Then, we would have no idea who created it.

Maybe the very God that you're talking about created it.

But that God, whether He was created or not, would have to come into existence at some time.

Like, where does that leave us?

We can't make something from nothing.

If the God we talk about was made into being from something like dark matter, then we would have to trace the origin of dark matter itself.

This is confusing.

I know I sound critical, but how is it possible for God not to be created? Did He just come into existence by pure chance?