Why is it so hard for you to accept that evolution is fact?

Sort:
WTFrickenA

...before the great void, there yeah was evolution... but THEN THERE WAS LIGHT.

shadowtanuki
TheRealWilliam2 wrote:
Evolution fails to account for the law of Entropy which we have proven first hand instead of speculated about. Things do not move from disorder to order

Order and disorder are arbitrary distinctions that only relate to the human perspective. They are meaningless in terms of natural phenomena.

Georgethegrate
Are they though? Why ought the fact that we see things from a human perspective disqualify it to be true? We have seen many examples of entropy and no examples opposing it. So how i see it, you can either believe the law of entropy is absolute and the big bang did not happen or you can believe there is another perspective held by another being other than ourselves. Both prove the supernatural
Brain
286 One, order is subjective, two, localized increase in “order” is not a universal increase
Georgethegrate
What do you mean by that second point? I can you expound
Georgethegrate
And I already addressed the first point
Deaconsz

The very fact that we can't say with certainty and are unable to be sure about it shows the limitation of human perspective though it doesn't need to necessarily be right every time

WTFrickenA

Why..... seriously why see from a worldly point of view when you would then always be off from what REALITY ever is? Were you to base your viewpoints from who actually created you IN HIS IMAGE AND LIKENESS then you'd perceive what's not seen physically, but Eternally.

WTFrickenA

.....TRUE LIFE

APersonWhoYoyos
290 no they aren’t. Order and disorder are measurable qualities that have been proven, with mathematical probabilities, to move in opposite directions. I simply don’t know what else to tell you. I’ll dig up the studies later if I have time
Sobrukai
DrakonicStriker_17 wrote:
U do realize that even scientists with 100 more iq than u know its just a theiry

A theory in science is something that is so well supported that it's pretty much a known fact. It is only listed as a theory because there is possible room for improvement.

Sobrukai
LordHunkyhair3 wrote:

Because the premise that I came from fish is not very appealing

I don't think you understand how evolution works, we are pretty far from our common ancestor with fish.

Sobrukai
SherlockHyden wrote:
#2 and the fact that if a species evolves to point where it becomes a new species it can no longer bread with members of the previous so that mutation would immediately die out so if evolution was fact all species would be able to interbreed. Evolution of a species obviously happens but the belief that all species came from a common ancestor is so flawed and still leave the open question how did life start we still can’t do it in a lab under perfect conditions much less is it going to got happen in such a hostile environment as ancient earth. Delete this message and you admit you’re wrong.

??? What??? Why would all species be able to interbreed? Why would a new species die out just because they can't interbreed with the old species? Are you acting like evolution happens overnight? No! It happens over many generations! Species change slowly and can still breed, keeping the genotypes and phenotypes which are being cherry picked with natural selection. Over time this results in a new species which sometimes can breed like donkeys and horses! Species do share a common ancestor and can recreate recreate life in a lab with the conditions of early earth, ever heard of the Miller-Urey's experiment?

Sobrukai
HADESTHEKING2 wrote:
The cristians will kill the op of this forum

Christians who deny evolution and mindless fools.

Boysamuel16

What is this thread

BoardMonkey

Good question @Boysamuel15. You have your whole life ahead of you to explore that question.

Boysamuel16

Hhhmmm

Boysamuel16

What does #311 even mean

Boysamuel16

I'm not reading all of #311

Boysamuel16

But what is this thread actually about

This forum topic has been locked