Discussions of cheating potential cheating or cheat detection are not allowed in the general forums.
If you would like to discuss join the following club.
https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum
A New Way to Fight Cheating: The “Panopticon Bot” System
Sort:
Let’s be honest, whatever online platforms are doing to fight cheating right now is not working. It doesn’t matter if chess.com detects every cheater retroactively. Those players just make new accounts and go again. The problem must be stopped proactively so that it ceases to exist, not just punished after the fact.
So here’s a proposal:
Create two separate ladders for bullet time controls (1-minute and 3-minute games).\
One ladder continues as things are. That is, no change from the current system!
The second ladder is monitored by the “Panopticon Bot” system.
Let players choose between the old ladder and new one. Let’s see how quickly people gravitate toward the audited, cheat-resistant environment.
The Panopticon Bot System
Inspired by the concept of the Panopticon ``A structure designed so that everyone inside knows they might be watched, even if they don’t know when or by whom." This system introduces constant potential surveillance to online chess, not to punish, but to protect.
Here’s how it works:
One out of every ten games is secretly played against a Stockfish bot.
The bot uses only top-5 engine moves and mimics human timing using randomized, quantile-based delays.
The bot assumes the profile of a real player and is indistinguishable during the game.
If you lose to the bot, the system notifies you and refunds your rating points.
If you win or draw, you played a real human. Congratulations.
The randomness ensures players can’t predict when they’re facing the bot. You’ll never know which game is real and which one was watched until after it's overe.
Why This Works
This doesn’t catch cheaters. It invalidates their entire strategy. If they cheat, they risk running into a bot and exposing their engine. If they don’t cheat, they’re fine. Either way, they can no longer rely on exploiting vulnerabilities in the system.
The uncertainty of surveillance changes behavior. Just like the original Panopticon prison design, this method relies on the psychology of being possibly observed, not actual detection.
But unlike a prison, this is freedom. Freedom from the plague of cheating. Freedom to play bullet chess without paranoia.
Built-In Safeguards
To prevent exploitation or pattern recognition:
Bot games are inserted pseudo-randomly.
After a cluster of bot appearances, the system can pause insertion temporarily to break any emerging patterns.
Common Questions
“Won’t this frustrate honest players?”
No more than they already are. If you get paired against a bot and lose, your rating is refunded. If you beat it, it’s just a win. Compared to the constant unease of facing suspected cheaters, this is a massive upgrade. Not to mention, they have the OPTION of playing on the OLD LADDER, right!?
“What if I beat a bot and never find out?”
Then enjoy the bragging rights. You beat a top-5 move Stockfish in bullet. Post the game if you even manage to survive the ban.
“Could strong players be mistaken for bots?”
No. Even Magnus Carlsen can't go toe-to-toe with Stockfish in 3|0 or 1|0 . He'd get smashed!
This system is designed specifically for bullet chess—formats like 3|0 or 1|0. Longer formats are already compromised beyond repair (in my opinion). Over-the-board is the only safe place for long-form chess on classic time controls.
Cheaters rely on predictability and control. This system takes both away. With minimal implementation effort, it forces a fundamental shift in how players approach the game. Suddenly, cheating is like trying to rob a casino where every 10th chip might explode.
You can’t win if you don’t know the rules have changed.
Let me know what you think. Is the Panopticon Bot ladder the future of fair play in online chess?