RonaldJosephCote wrote:
I doubt the're being fair to anyone.....us or themselves.
Thats the liberal mindset. Trying to squeeze a one size fits all mentality into a box.
Chess.com attitude to reporting and bannings.
Sort:
Feb 20, 2020
0
#23
1And7Then8 wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
The time of your banning......is not determined by YOU. When you go......and you will GO......you'll never see it coming.
You can't ban me, you are not staff and I suspect you won't have the opportunity to become staff. They received your first report shortly after I opened my account, along with reports from Bacon, Wollyhood, Aussierookie and Mustang. How come I suspect i'm not going anywhere?
You think i would waste my time reporting you, when all youll do is open another account?
Until chess.com gets serious about banning chronic offenders like you. I do not waste my time reporting them.
Feb 20, 2020
0
#24
1And7Then8 wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
1And7Then8 wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
The time of your banning......is not determined by YOU. When you go......and you will GO......you'll never see it coming.
You can't ban me, you are not staff and I suspect you won't have the opportunity to become staff. They received your first report shortly after I opened my account, along with reports from Bacon, Wollyhood, Aussierookie and Mustang. How come I suspect i'm not going anywhere?
You think i would waste my time reporting you, when all you do is open another account?
Yes, you said something like that before. "I am definitely not reporting you", So I thought you were deflecting and that you did report me and are reporting me again. You won't get very far trying to say you have better things to do or can't be bothered to report me when you CAN be bothered to reply and frequently.
replying to your act actually accomplishes more than reporting you. Its gives you the attention you crave.
IMBacon wrote:
replying to your act actually accomplishes more than reporting you. Its gives you the attention you crave.
is this the conservative mindset?
make bacon happy again?
you must have a doctorate in political science!
1And7Then8 a écrit :
JamesAgadir wrote:
I recently reported and obvious sandbagger on chess.com (100 1 or 2 moves loses in a row). I then got a message a few hours later saying there had been a reaction to one of my reports. I checked the player's profile and the player was banned.
Here's my question: why not tell me the player was banned? It's not like it's a secret, seen as it's said in the profile so it's not like chess.com is protecting them in anyway. Why not add that info in the message to the reporter when a player is banned so that people see that good reports have an actual impact and not just that chess.com claims to have acted?
If the account was closed why not let it be? Who chess.com elects to ban or mute isn't necessarily your business and i'm sure they made their policies and position known somewhere on this website.
If that isn't good enough for you I suggest becoming a staff and doing it yourself, if you're employable that is.
"Why not let it be" because I'm helping the staff by correctly reporting people and it would be isefull to know what reports chess.com react to and which ones they don't.
Chess.com has this section of the forum so that we can discuss potential improvements. This would make people who report correctly now there report was worthwhile and know what is worth reporting. So it would be an improvement that would help chess.com by improving reporting quality.
RonaldJosephCote a écrit :
To the OP....Jimmy Agadir... If you wish, I'll delete all my comments so you can salvage your thread. I doubt 178 would offer the same.
Well chess.com solved that problem it seems.
Feb 21, 2020
0
#29
SloppyLama wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
Make butter great again!
Churns are unsanitary so removing the image thx
<sigh>
Welcome back....again...
Last i checked. Butter churning wasnt against the site TOS.
I am completely baffled why the site hasn't gotten rid of 1And7Then8
Liberal mindset Ron.
"We want to be fair to everyone."