I finished a game and the summary said: 0 Mistakes, 2 Blunders, 0 Missed Wins. When I ran the Game Review, it listed 2 Mistakes, 0 Blunders, 0 Missed Wins. Not sure how to report this bug.
Not a bug. The summary it shows right after the game is at a lower depth than doing a full Game Review. In short, it is taking a more detailed look at your game and recalculating the quality of the moves.
LOL. It's not a bug it's a feature. We can add that lie to the other three most famous lies.
LOL. It's not a bug it's a feature. We can add that lie to the other three most famous lies.
A low depth analysis isn't the same as a higher depth one. There's nothing false about the statement and the post game analysis is lower than a Game Review is. 
Explain how it reduces the count on missed wins by analyzing to a higher depth?
Explain how it reduces the count on missed wins by analyzing to a higher depth?
Every move is analyzed more deeply. With deeper analysis, some moves may become better or worse. A move being marked better or worse may change how the Game Review classifies the move.
Explain how it reduces the count on missed wins by analyzing to a higher depth?
Every move is analyzed more deeply. With deeper analysis, some moves may become better or worse. A move being marked better or worse may change how the Game Review classifies the move.
I would think for it to classify a move as a missed win it'd be seeing a checkmate in some number of depth, thus more depth isn't going to change the number of missed wins.
I would think for it to classify a move as a missed win it'd be seeing a checkmate in some number of depth, thus more depth isn't going to change the number of missed wins.
The engine can find a defense at deeper depth that it didn't find at lower depth, so it's very possible for something like that to happen.
I finished a game and the summary said: 0 Mistakes, 2 Blunders, 0 Missed Wins. When I ran the Game Review, it listed 2 Mistakes, 0 Blunders, 0 Missed Wins. Not sure how to report this bug.