garbage can

in the garbage can that is online chess chess.com is terrible, the ratings are insulting, playing this site is like being slapped in the face, it's not free to play it's play or get dragged by a.i. and told as a chess player who can play chess that your rating is below a two year old childs, nobody who know and plays the game of chess should be rated at 800, what's worse is you can win one rapid game and be rated at 1700 and get dragged for ten straight losses in blitz, any payments to chess.com should be heavily taxed taken and redistributed to the people you insult

Well here's my salt intake for today

isn't it way past your bed-time ?

ratings are insulting and ruin the game, i play chess ratings are insulting and ruin the game

The accepted language on this site is English. Perhaps you could try an online translator so we could have half a clue what you are saying.

Looks like in the three days since joining you’ve played 20 games. Won  4 and lost 16. I suggest giving it a bit more time to get to the level of opponents you should be at and you’ll start find some success along the way. Blaming your losses on the “garbage can that is online chess chess.com” isn’t going to help you find success. 

Looks like someone is tilting

i didn't sign up to play stockfish i play chess i've played chess i've been rated, what your saying is a five year old child has an higher insight into the game of chess, using an engine to antagonize and ruining the game, 

Did the sixteen losses in a row have anything to do with your opinions?

I looked over a few of your recent games, and if your opponents are using engine assistance then it must be steam engines.

alright i've ranked at 1800 online in the game of chess, i've lost 1000 ratings points on multiple accounts over two week periods i've been at this a while it's a loop of continuous play that drags ratings, if that is the case why would kasparov chess disagree with you their is no continuous on legitimate chess sites the only ranked players who hold ratings are saved by fide oversight because they also play over the board threw fide associated clubs that is the truth

- "i've ranked at 1800 online"

When you joined the website, you arbitrarily picked 1800 as your starting rating.

When you first register on the site, it asks you how experienced you are at the game; and then assigns you a starting rating (between 800 and 2000) depending on your answer. If you over-state your qualifications and claim too much, then you'll start with a rating much higher than you can really maintain in competition and your rating will drop like a rock in the first few months until it reaches a more realistic value.

I started at 1200, by the way, and gained 1150 more points (up to 2351) the hard way.

*400-2000

Chess.com ratings aren't the same as OTB ratings or other sites. A 1200 rating here might be the same standard as a 1500 somewhere else. The main purpose is to  get equally matched opponents. It's only a number, You shouldn't take it as an insult.

Seeing as the OP has a USA flag I'll mention that I've known adults that have been playing chess for years (and have some understanding of strategy) that have US Chess OTB (over-the-board and in person) ratings under 300.  Their problem is missing tactical shots so their games are often interesting right up until they drop material.

The average person that knows how to move the pieces will lose to a 500-rated player.  High School coaches often receive e-mails from parents saying their incoming freshman beats everybody in the family and in the neighborhood and will be the school's new top board, and then the player turns out to be so weak that they don't even make the top ten (8 board teams).  If people measure their skill against the general populace (which they have been crushing) they may be in for a rude awakening once they face people who have been really playing and studying the game.

bootleg tabernacles have nothing to do with egypt or birthrights but i play my opponent so it's stated as such, points taken didn't have to translate it so that's good, could not differentiate because i follow chess, ben finegold has a 2800 rating on chess.com, why would i suppose a ratings gap if a human being has a 2800 rating on chess.com and i have an 800 rating, in twenty games and on different sites ratings were reasonable for a time it's a loop ordered by the site that drags ratings, i have no reason to assume a ratings fluctuation based on the fact that i follow tournament players and their ratings are 2200 plus.

there are plenty of lessons to be taken here that will help you improve, since apparently you overestimated your playing strength.

You're either poorly trying to troll or in need of psychological help

two open challenges for free and did not explain why gary kasparov chess site his online chess site does not use continuous play i repeat gary kasparov chess online chess site gary kasparov does not use continuous play never got a response on that but those two open challenges also wen't un answered 

Ah, now I understand you, and have an answer for you.

Cabbage.

Hope that helps.

bruh... from what i saw in your games i dont think that you play as a 1800 rated player by far...