Implementation of the 'Miss' in game review

I've seen it mark miss for not doing an exchange that improves the position. Without commentary it's hard to understand I guess. 

Seems like some moves that used to be classed as "blunder" are now classed as "miss," and actual blunders are fewer.

The changes in classifications include:

1. Improved Blunder Classification - It used to be that if the engine evaluation went down a lot, then you’d get a blunder. However, this isn’t how humans tend to evaluate. Engine evals can drop due to weird positional considerations that are hard to understand and require long-term precise play from your opponent to punish. In contrast, blunders are typically considered very immediate and concrete. The new blunder definition requires your move to lose material or allow a forced checkmate, in addition to the large drop in engine eval.
2. New Miss Classification - Sometimes a move is bad not because something went horribly wrong with your own position, but because you failed to punish your opponent’s bad move. For example: you’re in an even game, your opponent gives you the opportunity to fork and win a piece, but you just make a normal continuing move as if nothing happened. These cases will be covered by a new classification called Miss, which will be denoted with a Ø glyph.

I've been hoping we would see these new move classifications on the Android app soon since Game Review is calculated on the server.

Has anything been said on when we can expect to see these same move classifications on the Android app?

I haven't seen anything specific on that 

As a new player, I can everybody now that without any additional information it was hard to understand what the game review meant by "miss". That's pretty much the reason why I'm on this forum. So thanks for clearing it up, Martin_Stahl