PenguinChocolate wrote:
I'm over 2000, so I guess I qualify...
Only players with 2000+ rating should be allowed to upvote/downvote
Sort:
Resurrected after 6 months...
Oct 8, 2025
0
#24
Not these ban low rated players from forum threads again
Rapid and daily is what matters. Blitz and bullet is just how fast you are.
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
This is a chess forum and some people here want to see how to actually improve their chess by looking at which posts have the most upvotes. Except the posts with good advice get downvoted into oblivion by low rated trolls.
By restricting upvotes and downvotes to higher rated players who are clearly improving their chess and not trolling, people can clearly see which posts are legit.
Wow, you've been complaining for a long time about many things (on this thread and several others)! How about you get a life? Adopt a dog and go hiking, get a girlfriend or better yet, spend time studying chess instead of dissing those with lower ratings. You are not better than others because of your rating and that is how it comes across even if that's not what you meant. 
Someone might be new to this website, even new to the game, but that doesn't mean they lack common sense and if I see someone making sense, I have the right to upvote them. Period.
TransceiverTactics wrote:
These 'Only players' threads need to stop.
If someone posts and get a high volume of downvotes, that should tell them something important. Unfortunately, some never figure out that they might have some issues. Hopefully they grow out of it. 
I thought these types of threads were dead Ngl.
Oct 8, 2025
0
#31
Everyone gets a chance to participate. You aren't entitled to more selective use of features because of your rating is high
I downvoted, and I'm over 2000, so I hope Chompy is happy.
But seriously: how is this troll topic still open after 7 months?
How is Chompy still unbanned after trolling for years?
Oct 9, 2025
0
#33
magipi wrote:
I downvoted, and I'm over 2000, so I hope Chompy is happy.
But seriously: how is this troll topic still open after 7 months?
How is Chompy still unbanned after trolling for years?
He was banned before?
Just_an_average_player136 wrote:
magipi wrote:
I downvoted, and I'm over 2000, so I hope Chompy is happy.
But seriously: how is this troll topic still open after 7 months?
How is Chompy still unbanned after trolling for years?
He was banned before?
I've never been banned before. I'm also not trolling. If I was really banned before you would think chess.com would ban this account that's almost a year old?
Oct 9, 2025
0
#35
DavidWills99 wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
This is a chess forum and some people here want to see how to actually improve their chess by looking at which posts have the most upvotes. Except the posts with good advice get downvoted into oblivion by low rated trolls.
By restricting upvotes and downvotes to higher rated players who are clearly improving their chess and not trolling, people can clearly see which posts are legit.
Wow, you've been complaining for a long time about many things (on this thread and several others)! How about you get a life? Adopt a dog and go hiking, get a girlfriend or better yet, spend time studying chess instead of dissing those with lower ratings. You are not better than others because of your rating and that is how it comes across even if that's not what you meant.
Someone might be new to this website, even new to the game, but that doesn't mean they lack common sense and if I see someone making sense, I have the right to upvote them. Period.
rip
Oct 9, 2025
0
#36
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
Just_an_average_player136 wrote:
magipi wrote:
I downvoted, and I'm over 2000, so I hope Chompy is happy.
But seriously: how is this troll topic still open after 7 months?
How is Chompy still unbanned after trolling for years?
He was banned before?
I've never been banned before. I'm also not trolling. If I was really banned before you would think chess.com would ban this account that's almost a year old?
but who asked
I'm over 2000, so I guess I qualify...