But instead of rating 2000 restricted we could make it open
if u make it open everyone will come and server might crash, thats why it should be 2000+
No that destroys the whole purpose
But instead of rating 2000 restricted we could make it open
if u make it open everyone will come and server might crash, thats why it should be 2000+
No that destroys the whole purpose
But instead of rating 2000 restricted we could make it open
if u make it open everyone will come and server might crash, thats why it should be 2000+
No that destroys the whole purpose
Yep
If they would add this It should definitely not be open or 2000+ I would say 2200+ at a minimum but probably something like 2400+ makes more sense
If they would add this It should definitely not be open or 2000+ I would say 2200+ at a minimum but probably something like 2400+ makes more sense
2200+ would be nice ig
I don't like this idea, but I am a fan of the suggestion where the winner of Untitled Tuesday is eligible to participate in Titled Tuesday.
I think that would kind of defeat the purpose of the titled in titled tuesday, but agree that a seperate tourny (UTT) would be cool. Maybe the winner of each would face off?
I think that would kind of defeat the purpose of the titled in titled tuesday, but agree that a seperate tourny (UTT) would be cool. Maybe the winner of each would face off?
The winners cant faceoff, Hikaru vs 2000 like WTF
people that are titled and don't have a rating of 2000+ don't really deserve to be in titled tuesday. Like those CMs or WCMs or whatever that got their titles not by satisfying rating requirements but for performing well in one tourney. Those guys are usually the underrated ones.
I think that would kind of defeat the purpose of the titled in titled tuesday, but agree that a seperate tourny (UTT) would be cool. Maybe the winner of each would face off?
The winners cant faceoff, Hikaru vs 2000 like WTF
like the highest untitled players I can think of are @rychessmaster1 and @birb_memes
people that are titled and don't have a rating of 2000+ don't really deserve to be in titled tuesday. Like those CMs or WCMs or whatever that got their titles not by satisfying rating requirements but for performing well in one tourney. Those guys are usually the underrated ones.
Not only them, but titled players upto 2200 blitz I feel.
naw, 2200 is too much. Many NMs can't stay above 2200 consistently
K, 2100? Or better as I suggested, just find a way to include some players who are not titled into the tmt since it's no longer titled Tuesday, it's the speed chess grand Prix if u know what I mean
nah 2100 is too low. I mean I don't think there's any reason for a 2100 to be playing TT. I don't really think you should play unless you could realistically get like ~5/10. I think something like 2400+ makes sense as people over that are the only ones who could make a difference in TT and realistically hang with titled players. If you can't hang with NMs and non-elite FMs playing blitz in the pool you don't really have any business playing with them in TT
Well, till some point you are right, but then the term "Titled Tuesday" doesnt make any sense.
How many times should I tell this!? It's not titled Tuesday anymore!!! It's called the speed chess grand prix! I called it titled Tuesday in the title of this forum since everyone will understand what it means!!
lol