Petition to include higher rated players in the titled tuesday event as well

Sort:
Lightning

lol

The_nail
vishnu_vijay_93 wrote:
ananthramdas wrote:

But instead of rating 2000 restricted we could make it open

if u make it open everyone will come and server might crash, thats why it should be 2000+

No that destroys the whole purpose

vishnu_vijay_93
The_nail wrote:
vishnu_vijay_93 wrote:
ananthramdas wrote:

But instead of rating 2000 restricted we could make it open

if u make it open everyone will come and server might crash, thats why it should be 2000+

No that destroys the whole purpose

Yep

iofferyoutoresign

thumbup.png

The_nail

I think they should keep it how it is

FizzyBand

If they would add this It should definitely not be open or 2000+ I would say 2200+ at a minimum but probably something like 2400+ makes more sense

vishnu_vijay_93
FizzyBand wrote:

If they would add this It should definitely not be open or 2000+ I would say 2200+ at a minimum but probably something like 2400+ makes more sense

2200+ would be nice ig

2Ke21-0

I don't like this idea, but I am a fan of the suggestion where the winner of Untitled Tuesday is eligible to participate in Titled Tuesday. 

LeeEuler

I think that would kind of defeat the purpose of the titled in titled tuesday, but agree that a seperate tourny (UTT) would be cool. Maybe the winner of each would face off?

The_nail
LeeEuler wrote:

I think that would kind of defeat the purpose of the titled in titled tuesday, but agree that a seperate tourny (UTT) would be cool. Maybe the winner of each would face off?

The winners cant faceoff, Hikaru vs 2000 like WTF

sndeww

people that are titled and don't have a rating of 2000+ don't really deserve to be in titled tuesday. Like those CMs or WCMs or whatever that got their titles not by satisfying rating requirements but for performing well in one tourney. Those guys are usually the underrated ones.

sndeww
The_nail wrote:
LeeEuler wrote:

I think that would kind of defeat the purpose of the titled in titled tuesday, but agree that a seperate tourny (UTT) would be cool. Maybe the winner of each would face off?

The winners cant faceoff, Hikaru vs 2000 like WTF

like the highest untitled players I can think of are @rychessmaster1 and @birb_memes

vishnu_vijay_93
SNUDOO wrote:

people that are titled and don't have a rating of 2000+ don't really deserve to be in titled tuesday. Like those CMs or WCMs or whatever that got their titles not by satisfying rating requirements but for performing well in one tourney. Those guys are usually the underrated ones.

Not only them, but titled players upto 2200 blitz I feel. 

sndeww

naw, 2200 is too much. Many NMs can't stay above 2200 consistently

vishnu_vijay_93
SNUDOO wrote:

naw, 2200 is too much. Many NMs can't stay above 2200 consistently

K, 2100? Or better as I suggested, just find a way to include some players who are not titled into the tmt since it's no longer titled Tuesday, it's the speed chess grand Prix if u know what I mean

FizzyBand

nah 2100 is too low. I mean I don't think there's any reason for a 2100 to be playing TT. I don't really think you should play unless you could realistically get like ~5/10. I think something like 2400+ makes sense as people over that are the only ones who could make a difference in TT and realistically hang with titled players. If you can't hang with NMs and non-elite FMs playing blitz in the pool you don't really have any business playing with them in TT

rishabh11great

Well, till some point you are right, but then the term "Titled Tuesday" doesnt make any sense.

vishnu_vijay_93
rishabh11great wrote:

Well, till some point you are right, but then the term "Titled Tuesday" doesnt make any sense.

How many times should I tell this!? It's not titled Tuesday anymore!!! It's called the speed chess grand prix! I called it titled Tuesday in the title of this forum since everyone will understand what it means!!

rishabh11great

Ohh

rishabh11great

Then surely 2300+ should be allowed.