Nope what's dat?
Petition to lock the various "ban low rated players from forums" threads.
Sort:
May 20, 2025
0
#183
L petition. Sorry but this feels like it’s infringing in freedom of speech. I don’t agree with those threads for several reasons but I don’t think locking them is the right or reasonable answer.
201 read post #1 dude. I stayed directly in it that I don’t actually want them locked, the title is a mock satire of the way they title their threads
May 20, 2025
0
#185
Abtectous wrote:
L petition. Sorry but this feels like it’s infringing in freedom of speech. I don’t agree with those threads for several reasons but I don’t think locking them is the right or reasonable answer.
But advocating for the removal of low-rated players from the forums also infringes on their freedom of speech. A paradox we have here...
Celebration time 🎇
I refuse I like chess and I wanna play chess also in 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 .....
Years
Soy incapaz de entender las puntuaciones que se otorgan a las partidas. Si juego con un rival con una puntuación menor que la mia, me otorgan 3 o 4 puntos. Si le gano a alguien con una puntuación superior lo máximo que me dan son unos 8 puntos. Y pierda con quién pierda me quitan entre 10 y 12 puntos. Alguien me lo puede explicar?
May 25, 2025
0
#194
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
how come this thread isn't locked yet?
Ig it wouldn't.
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
how come this thread isn't locked yet?
Because it isn't ragebaiting, it's a critique of how illogical the threads calling for the banning of low rated players are
May 25, 2025
0
#196
Abtectous wrote:
L petition. Sorry but this feels like it’s infringing in freedom of speech. I don’t agree with those threads for several reasons but I don’t think locking them is the right or reasonable answer.
You do not have freedom of speech on a privately owned forum. That right applies to public property. i.e. unless you can convincingly argue C.C forums are some equivalent of a 'town square' you have no claim to speech protections. Considering they outright ban political and religious speech... this thread would only be the tip of the iceberg.
I'd like it if there were stronger protections of speech online, even on forums like this, but that isn't the law. But on that front I don't think the retarded speech is what I'd focus my efforts on protecting.
Not to interrupt the celebrations.
May 25, 2025
0
#197
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
how come this thread isn't locked yet?
Looks like you lose.
May 25, 2025
0
#199
It seems that way due to your overly abstract idea of how ethics work. It results in you being unable to tell the difference between obvious things, like a thread attacking the intelligence of / calling for bans of masses of players vs. one calling for the forum rules to be enforced.
Just when the site traffic is very high, as of now basically no one can sign in when it's down, so why not just temporarily cut the lower end of the playing field when nearing max capacity. Allowing the more interesting games to fill up the server space, vs the fried liver noobs that would get totally demolished by my Traxler CounterAttack 😎😎😎
How is this supposed to help if the slow network traffic is caused by a DDoS attack? Do you even know what a DDoS attack is?