Please bring back the Beth Harmon bots

Sort:
AnastasiaStyles
Soniasthetics wrote:

I don't see the big issue in writing something that has more fan service in it as long as it has a good storyline. 

 

You seem to be mistaking criticising bad writing, for outrage. I'm not sure why. Let me make it simpler: my reaction is not "😡", it's "🙄".

 

Soniasthetics wrote:

People are too sensitive now a days.

 

Ok, boomer.

IsraeliGal

"ok boomer" u look like u've hit ur midlife crisis and ur surrounded by cats but go off. 

 

 

 

AnastasiaStyles
Soniasthetics wrote:

"ok boomer" u look like u've hit ur midlife crisis and ur surrounded by cats but go off. 

 

That doesn't sound so bad happy.png

IsraeliGal

That's what someone whos in a midlife crisis would say.

 

AnastasiaStyles
Soniasthetics wrote:

That's what someone whos in a midlife crisis would say.

 

Thank you for your opinion!

Blaze2983

Pls bring them back

PetraGompa

"YOur wish is noble" 🙂 who search find as the Proverb says , The page is a little messy but it works (....https://web.archive.org/web/20210106152910/chess.com/play/computer)

Share

Have a Good One !

 

 

awesomename91

the name is queens gambit

awesomename91

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

EscherehcsE

Beth Harmon. That name sounds vaguely familiar...

JamieDelarosa

Re-watching Queen's Gambit now, while cooking dinner.

Nandini_Mahajan

Please if someone is seeing this comment then i think you can understand that they were so fun to play please chess.com bring them back 😥

 

Martin_Stahl
Nandini_Mahajan wrote:

Please if someone is seeing this comment then i think you can understand that they were so fun to play please chess.com bring them back 😥

 

 

The site would like it but they can't make that decision since it's a licensing issue (and potentially a cost related to it).

JamieDelarosa
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Nandini_Mahajan wrote:

Please if someone is seeing this comment then i think you can understand that they were so fun to play please chess.com bring them back 😥

 

 

The site would like it but they can't make that decision since it's a licensing issue (and potentially a cost related to it).

The issue is the name used and the images for the player(s).  The algorithms, as far as I know, are not covered under the license.

Thanksgiving_Turkey

pleasechesspawn.pngchess.com!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Martin_Stahl
JamieDelarosa wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Nandini_Mahajan wrote:

Please if someone is seeing this comment then i think you can understand that they were so fun to play please chess.com bring them back 😥

 

 

The site would like it but they can't make that decision since it's a licensing issue (and potentially a cost related to it).

The issue is the name used and the images for the player(s).  The algorithms, as far as I know, are not covered under the license.

 

Sure, they could add some other bots with different names, pictures and bios, but then that isn't Beth Harmon wink.png

llama47
Martin_Stahl wrote:
JamieDelarosa wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Nandini_Mahajan wrote:

Please if someone is seeing this comment then i think you can understand that they were so fun to play please chess.com bring them back 😥

 

 

The site would like it but they can't make that decision since it's a licensing issue (and potentially a cost related to it).

The issue is the name used and the images for the player(s).  The algorithms, as far as I know, are not covered under the license.

 

Sure, they could add some other bots with different names, pictures and bios, but then that isn't Beth Harmon

Just make a new bot, copy Beth's AI settings, and cleverly get around it by naming her "Barth Herman."

Change the pfp by giving her oversized sunglasses.

JamieDelarosa
llama47 wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
JamieDelarosa wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Nandini_Mahajan wrote:

Please if someone is seeing this comment then i think you can understand that they were so fun to play please chess.com bring them back 😥

 

 

The site would like it but they can't make that decision since it's a licensing issue (and potentially a cost related to it).

The issue is the name used and the images for the player(s).  The algorithms, as far as I know, are not covered under the license.

 

Sure, they could add some other bots with different names, pictures and bios, but then that isn't Beth Harmon

Just make a new bot, copy Beth's AI settings, and cleverly get around it by naming her "Barth Herman."

Change the pfp by giving her oversized sunglasses.

Or "Betty" or "Liz" - or use blonde hair. Beth was a redhead in Netflix, but a brunette in the novel.

Martin_Stahl

But changing all the details, even if its the same settings for the engine, isn't Beth and people would still say, "bring back Beth" ....

JamieDelarosa
Martin_Stahl wrote:

But changing all the details, even if its the same settings for the engine, isn't Beth and people would still say, "bring back Beth" ....

Perhaps so.  The character was widely admired in the chess community.  And the bots were fun to play.