*SUGGESTION* Average Accuracy

Sort:
TheKnightGeorge

Can you PLEASE add an average accuracy score for our profiles?

E.g. if your average accuracy for games you play is 72% then can that pls be displayed on our profiles?

Get back to me if you can and if you want to know more about my idea.

Thanks, 
@TheKnightGeorge

Martin_Stahl
TheKnightGeorge wrote:

Can you PLEASE add an average accuracy score for our profiles?

E.g. if your average accuracy for games you play is 72% then can that pls be displayed on our profiles?

Get back to me if you can and if you want to know more about my idea.

 

Thanks, 
@TheKnightGeorge

 

Not every game gets analyzed and depth can be different on member's analysis. So as a metric, it probably would only be moderately useful.

TheKnightGeorge
bbmaxwell wrote:

Not a bad idea.

Which is probably why it wont happen.

Accuracy isn't mean to actually rank people.  Like all features it's a gimmick whose core purpose is to make Erik money.

No, no, of course not ranking.
But it would give you a rough idea of how well you're playing. Chess.com, cmon!

TheKnightGeorge
Martin_Stahl wrote:
TheKnightGeorge wrote:

Can you PLEASE add an average accuracy score for our profiles?

E.g. if your average accuracy for games you play is 72% then can that pls be displayed on our profiles?

Get back to me if you can and if you want to know more about my idea.

 

Thanks, 
@TheKnightGeorge

 

Not every game gets analyzed and depth can be different on member's analysis. So as a metric, it probably would only be moderately useful.

Would still be useful!

drmrboss
TheKnightGeorge wrote:
bbmaxwell wrote:

Not a bad idea.

Which is probably why it wont happen.

Accuracy isn't mean to actually rank people.  Like all features it's a gimmick whose core purpose is to make Erik money.

No, no, of course not ranking.
But it would give you a rough idea of how well you're playing. Chess.com, cmon!

How well you played in chess.com is already measured by your "rating", which is the most reliable indicator of performance.

All chess websites or tournments use "Elo/Glicko rating" .

 

CAPS score or Accuracy has much much more flaws than rating, it will never be an indicator of your performance, but it is a good additional information.

TheKnightGeorge
drmrboss wrote:
TheKnightGeorge wrote:
bbmaxwell wrote:

Not a bad idea.

Which is probably why it wont happen.

Accuracy isn't mean to actually rank people.  Like all features it's a gimmick whose core purpose is to make Erik money.

No, no, of course not ranking.
But it would give you a rough idea of how well you're playing. Chess.com, cmon!

How well you played in chess.com is already measured by your "rating", which is the most reliable indicator of performance.

All chess websites or tournments use "Elo/Glicko rating" .

Yes, I know that. However, it would be helpful for us to see our rating (and just cool!)
OF COURSE I'm not saying ratings should be decided upon accuracy.

drmrboss
TheKnightGeorge wrote:
drmrboss wrote:
TheKnightGeorge wrote:
bbmaxwell wrote:

Not a bad idea.

Which is probably why it wont happen.

Accuracy isn't mean to actually rank people.  Like all features it's a gimmick whose core purpose is to make Erik money.

No, no, of course not ranking.
But it would give you a rough idea of how well you're playing. Chess.com, cmon!

How well you played in chess.com is already measured by your "rating", which is the most reliable indicator of performance.

All chess websites or tournments use "Elo/Glicko rating" .

Yes, I know that. However, it would be helpful for us to see our rating (and just cool!)
OF COURSE I'm not saying ratings should be decided upon accuracy.

CAPS scores requires massive CPU resources to analyse.

Unless ERIK has 1 million CPUs, he cant provide you CAP score of millions of games played here.

TheKnightGeorge
drmrboss wrote:
TheKnightGeorge wrote:
drmrboss wrote:
TheKnightGeorge wrote:
bbmaxwell wrote:

Not a bad idea.

Which is probably why it wont happen.

Accuracy isn't mean to actually rank people.  Like all features it's a gimmick whose core purpose is to make Erik money.

No, no, of course not ranking.
But it would give you a rough idea of how well you're playing. Chess.com, cmon!

How well you played in chess.com is already measured by your "rating", which is the most reliable indicator of performance.

All chess websites or tournments use "Elo/Glicko rating" .

Yes, I know that. However, it would be helpful for us to see our rating (and just cool!)
OF COURSE I'm not saying ratings should be decided upon accuracy.

CAPS scores requires massive CPU resources to analyse.

Unless ERIK has 1 million CPUs, he cant provide you CAP score of millions of games played here.

Oh, ok. Then it could be an average of games analyzed? 
OR the depth of analyzation could be lower?