Why are you letting YGNR accounts flood the forum, chess.com??

LOL ... good job of deflection. Ur in the ballpark- out in right field somewhere.

A hint: It's based on the premise "Guys are always a sucker for a pretty face." YGNR has a propensity of creating accounts of his opposite gender.

                                    I think your refering to Johnny Mushacha. He started out being angry at Staff. I thought it was easier to make friends with him than to make enemies with him and he's been quiet for yrs.

Your personal opinion != everyone's opinion/my reputation .   This is a fairly common mistake made by Narcissists. 

****

wha-WHAT ?? how in the he!! did u ever come up w/ narcissist ?....there miracle fingers ? 

okay. u wanna know the deffa narcissism ? fine. here....

....ur entitled to my opinion !!

Lola would be the last person to label as a narcissist.

    Post 300 from Red Girl......  "I see you as an immature old individual, with nothing else to do than harass people on a chess forum similarly to ronald".                                                                    Perhaps a trip to the mall will do you some good Sonia. I can assure you the 1st thing me & M.M do after we flop out of bed in the mourning is say......"WHO can we harass today"?........  We picked on the Irish yesterday, lets make it the Jews today.                                                                                                                 note to self......I should put a smiley face at the end of that.

If Malls are not your thing ... there's always Walmart. They offer free eye exams. Oh wait a sec, perhaps you don't know of Walmart. Are they in Israel yet?

You've had the pleasure of meeting her DownUnder ?

Now you're getting somewhere.

I feel like the Australian accent is like a Texan version of a British accent. 

Then it must be true !

Nice luxury there, copying 1/2 the post, the part that suits your purpose and leaving out the part of sarcasm? Now it's "selective copy/paste" is it? In effect editing my post, and adding your response ! Nice job of it. Another lesson to be learned ?

Come on now btickler. Whats's with the do as I say, not as I do hypocrisy? 

If you can find anywhere that I said I always quote the entire post I am replying to, then you'll really have something.  I didn't though.  I've never said that.  You know how I know that?  Because I've always quoted the meaningful part(s) I am responding to and jettisoned the rest, for my entire time here in the forums.  You *have* correctly discerned that I threw away the more insipid content in your post.  Congratulations.

Now, why not just give it up while you're far behind?  Shoo.  You really haven't got the chops to score any points here (it takes some real skill to poke holes in the truth ...), and the attempts are getting cringeworthy.  A mustang you are not.  Camel, perhaps.

Here it is btickler. One time only.

Quote - "I always quote the posts I refer to."

Not part of the posts, not the parts that suit yourself but -

"I always quote the posts"

So quote the post, NOT an edited selection. Not the parts you alone deem relevant. 

A reasonable person can assume, when saying "I always quote the post" would assume the entire post to be copied.

NOT an edited version. There you have it. The evidence you requested. The readers will make their own conclusion.

So, in your dictionary, to quote somebody means to to repeat everything they have uttered verbatim?  Because that's not what my dictionary says.  Quoting is selective *by default*.  Ergo, saying I always quote posts I am replying to clearly implies that said quoting may be partial, because *that's the standard usage of the word*.  Saying you are quoting someone implies only that you have taken some portion of what they have communicated that you deem quotable for some purpose.  

Now, go find somebody quoting "Fourscore and seven years ago" and then read them the riot act for not reciting the entire Gettysburg Address...that should keep you busy.  You keep trying to save face on contorting technicalities but the hole just keeps getting deeper...

  "Because I've always quoted the meaningful part(s) I am responding to and jettisoned the rest". btickler

Hey ! Wow. Good to meet someone who objectively has the ability to distinguish what's relevant or not. A real psychic is rare indeed.

It's pretty easy in your case .

This all began over you quoting a post, a post where someone advertised their Club. You quoted the post and supplied link, suggesting such activity is against policy. 

Another member pointed out, if ur going to report him, may as well report yourself. Why ? Because you REPEATED the infraction in part, by copying the post, as evidence in case he deleted it. 

I made a comment about using common sense and agreed. Copying such posts only further benefits the offender who provided a link to his club. We all know it's an infraction. No need to repeat it.

All we've heard is your justifications for such. OK. Fine. Some members have a different view, would not copy/paste objectionable posts, not worry about the poster possibly deleting the post, but rather simply report it.

1. New account posts on ygnr thread - check

2. Wins all her games - check

3. Friends with @drmrboss - pending... 

Mods, are you watching 

Are you watching 

Are you watching, Annie

You've been hit by a... 

Yes, everyone reading knows what you posted and how you feel about it, because you have recapped twice now when you had no other arguments left.  With the original, that makes 3 times you have recounted how you can't understand the logic involved in quoting posts.  In between each retreat to ground zero you have tried to worm your way to victory, all to back up an aside you didn't need to make in the first place.  

You made a comment, I pointed out how it didn't make sense, you made numerous other points, I pointed out how they didn't really make sense either.  You return to the original argument repeatedly as if the results will somehow change from the last time, and I point out how *that* doesn't make sense.  I'm not even going to address the paragraph you just added...it would probably be better for all involved if you just moved on before you restate your original position for a fourth time .