Larsera wrote:
Thanks for the explanation Erik - I love this site and have confidence that you and the rest will be able to maintain the high quality we all appreciate!
Hear, hear!
Chess Changes???
Sort:
Should I have said lover??? What???
Apr 9, 2011
0
#125
None of this matters does it? Isn't the point that Erik said that they knew how to do it, but just hadn't found time.... The simple question that appears to have been asked here, is what is the expected time line?...Erik any chance of a further comment on this please mate?
Apr 9, 2011
0
#126
Taxi wrote: None of this matters does it? Isn't the point that Erik said that they knew how to do it, but just hadn't found time.... The simple question that appears to have been asked here, is what is the expected time line?...Erik any chance of a further comment on this please mate?
There are several dozen threads currently discussing the absence of the Average Opponent Rating. In one of them, we had this exchange ...
TheMouse wrote: .. i wish Erik had put an approximate date on all of those features, rather than the annoyingly vague "and after that".
Erik wrote: what's more annoying - me making predictions that i cannot control and having you be disappointed in the future? or leaving it vague?
Well in that case I think a courtesy advisory should have taken place,whether an answer is now,predicted or vague,people have paid their fees and expect to receive what is in
To be continued...................................
Kind regards and respect to all,Debbie.
In.......the deal.
User: Hey Erik, I have a solution. How about you add "t" number of ratings together and then divide by t to find the average? Hope that helps in case you didn't know.
Erik: Bi*** please, I got this.
x10 throughout the course of thread.
waffllemaster wrote:
User: Hey Erik, I have a solution. How about you add "t" number of ratings together and then divide by t to find the average? Hope that helps in case you didn't know.
Erik: Bi*** please, I got this.
x10 throughout the course of thread.
Nah, I only counted six or seven times...
"My completed tournaments" were a completed record but now one or two have vanished,could someone tell me why please ?
Apr 11, 2011
0
#132
artfizz wrote:
Taxi wrote: None of this matters does it? Isn't the point that Erik said that they knew how to do it, but just hadn't found time.... The simple question that appears to have been asked here, is what is the expected time line?...Erik any chance of a further comment on this please mate?
There are several dozen threads currently discussing the absence of the Average Opponent Rating. In one of them, we had this exchange ...
TheMouse wrote: .. i wish Erik had put an approximate date on all of those features, rather than the annoyingly vague "and after that".
Erik wrote: what's more annoying - me making predictions that i cannot control and having you be disappointed in the future? or leaving it vague?
Well, my answer to Erik would have been that I would prefer a rough idea of when this can be expected......Any chance Erik please?
Excellent a short answer which alleviates the immediate concerns,looking forward to having the stats back,...................................to be continued ?
Apr 11, 2011
0
#135
erik wrote:
by wednesday at the latest
Yay, it's up!!
Thanks Erik and chess.com!
Looks good.
Apr 12, 2011
0
#137
Thank you Eric, and thank you staff - we appreciate your hard work and efforts. This is the world's best chess site, and we are an excellent community, all because of your great efforts. It is nice to know there are professionals in control. Keep Truckin' brothers!
The prodigal stat returns to welcoming minds worldwide! Bravo, & Thank you Chess.com!
Apr 12, 2011
0
#139
A little courtesy notification (and a fix within 2-3 weeks) and there's have been no need for this thread
partner?
He is a policeman, obviously.