Express if you like or do not like the new version of the site

Actually, that first one was different than the last one I posted. 

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/new-site-design-feedback

This topic was closer in length when I first added the link 

The new version of chess.com is inconvenient and I don't like it at all.

No one has proved anything. But go ahead, feel smug. I never said the 20% value was a v2 vs v3 preference.

I could have predicted that a poll would likely end up with more people saying they preferred v2. That in no way invalidates the fact that when v2 is gone, the vast majority of them will still play on v3. That, and premium membership losses, is what my 20% comment was about. Please try and understand what I post instead of coming up with your own assumptions. 

Years after that, players will start posting topics about disliking the newest change at that time. 

That's the app and not directly v3 related.

Sure thing captain. Whatever you say. 

Less that 1% of members voting and that proves your point. v2's retirement can't come soon enough 

as c.com moderators stop us from posting news to our own groups ,let alone others ,that 1% speaks volumes.

Moderators don't moderate groups. Staff will if someone reports it.

still moderators message me to warn me off ,yet they haven,t a moniker and could be joe soap for all I know ,they get short shrift from me,Give them a swaztika at least so we plebs can rcognise them

Why don't them moderate spammers?

funny enough moderator diakonia reported me for spamming ,I was posting v3-v-v2 on my own groups pages ,and I was then muted ,whatever that is.?

xming wrote:

Martin_Stahl wrote:

Moderators don't moderate groups. Staff will if someone reports it.

Why don't them moderate spammers?

muting a poor mans gelding

They do. Some slip through and some you consider spam, some mods may not.

At razz, mods can make mistakes sometimes.

Ah, look at this thread. Ridiculous videos.

Indeed - look at this thread: V3.   Nearly 3,000 posts, most detrimental towards V3, maybe 20% in favor of V3, the rest an attempt to defend V3 or vilify those antagonists. 

And yet, we remain on course for V3.  2.5 years after its fabled introduction.

2.5 years.

Yeah, 2.5 years.  That's still one of my main gripes.

I think Martin mentioned (pages ago) the conversion from V1 to V2 was quicker.

I don't recall the length of the beta but the switch, when it happened, was quick. Mainly because of an accident, if I recall correctly, but staying on the old version was gone. This transition is longer, in an attempt to make things better for more members. Though, it's kind of hard to tell which is better 

Well I've given up on V2 staying around.  And for that matter, I've given up that the spammers will be taken care of.  They ruin threads and are generally disruptive but others get blocked for mentioning something remotely political.  Nothing like having priorities right.

There is a difference between off-topic posts and spam. Off topic posts have been moderated much more leniently than some other things and it has been like that for a long time. 

There will always be things that are higher priority and things that are less stringently enforced. If staff wants more enforcement of those type of posts, then that will end up happening.

You won't get any argument from me Martin.  I've cancelled my membership for 2 reasons: V3 and spammers.  My money went to Lichess. So now if I come here and get V3 or some spam, oh well, you win.

exodus - bob marley