The dumbest threads on forums are... - Chess Forums - Page 8

polydiatonic

Aug 31, 2010

0

#141

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

paul211 wrote:

Dumb threads do not exist. The perception of the reader is in cause here.

Some people want to be funny, others inquisitive or challenging or make a statement to get an opinion.

Paul, really? I get your concept here, like: "there are no bad parts, just bad actors". The problem is that by your logic there are also no such things as:

Bad cars, bad breath, bad intentions, bad science, bad chess moves, etc, etc...

Sorry Mahatma, but we live in a world, at least I do, where things (some times know as "reality" are judged based upon our subjective EXPERIENCE. So, that means that what's bad for me might be good for you because of what we, relative to our experiences, take away from that which we are currently experiencing. However, it also means the opposite can be true. Thus what is good for me may be bad for you.

If a mountain lion decided to gnaw your face off, that would be a "bad" experience for you. Sorry, but it really would...even if you ultimately gained some rich experience from the injury later, in the moment it would be bad.

maybe he was 'just' referring to good manners

oh the irony....

giratina999

Aug 31, 2010

0

#142

polydiatonic wrote:

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

paul211 wrote:

Dumb threads do not exist. The perception of the reader is in cause here.

Some people want to be funny, others inquisitive or challenging or make a statement to get an opinion.

Paul, really? I get your concept here, like: "there are no bad parts, just bad actors". The problem is that by your logic there are also no such things as:

Bad cars, bad breath, bad intentions, bad science, bad chess moves, etc, etc...

Sorry Mahatma, but we live in a world, at least I do, where things (some times know as "reality" are judged based upon our subjective EXPERIENCE. So, that means that what's bad for me might be good for you because of what we, relative to our experiences, take away from that which we are currently experiencing. However, it also means the opposite can be true. Thus what is good for me may be bad for you.

If a mountain lion decided to gnaw your face off, that would be a "bad" experience for you. Sorry, but it really would...even if you ultimately gained some rich experience from the injury later, in the moment it would be bad.

maybe he was 'just' referring to good manners

oh the irony....

go back right up to the top and see how Shaggy prioritised good manners.

onetwentysix

Aug 31, 2010

0

#143

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

paul211 wrote:

Dumb threads do not exist. The perception of the reader is in cause here.

Some people want to be funny, others inquisitive or challenging or make a statement to get an opinion.

Paul, really? I get your concept here, like: "there are no bad parts, just bad actors". The problem is that by your logic there are also no such things as:

Bad cars, bad breath, bad intentions, bad science, bad chess moves, etc, etc...

Sorry Mahatma, but we live in a world, at least I do, where things (some times know as "reality" are judged based upon our subjective EXPERIENCE. So, that means that what's bad for me might be good for you because of what we, relative to our experiences, take away from that which we are currently experiencing. However, it also means the opposite can be true. Thus what is good for me may be bad for you.

If a mountain lion decided to gnaw your face off, that would be a "bad" experience for you. Sorry, but it really would...even if you ultimately gained some rich experience from the injury later, in the moment it would be bad.

maybe he was 'just' referring to good manners

oh the irony....

go back right up to the top and see how Shaggy prioritised good manners.

what good manners

polydiatonic

Aug 31, 2010

0

#144

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

paul211 wrote:

Dumb threads do not exist. The perception of the reader is in cause here.

Some people want to be funny, others inquisitive or challenging or make a statement to get an opinion.

Paul, really? I get your concept here, like: "there are no bad parts, just bad actors". The problem is that by your logic there are also no such things as:

Bad cars, bad breath, bad intentions, bad science, bad chess moves, etc, etc...

Sorry Mahatma, but we live in a world, at least I do, where things (some times know as "reality" are judged based upon our subjective EXPERIENCE. So, that means that what's bad for me might be good for you because of what we, relative to our experiences, take away from that which we are currently experiencing. However, it also means the opposite can be true. Thus what is good for me may be bad for you.

If a mountain lion decided to gnaw your face off, that would be a "bad" experience for you. Sorry, but it really would...even if you ultimately gained some rich experience from the injury later, in the moment it would be bad.

maybe he was 'just' referring to good manners

oh the irony....

go back right up to the top and see how Shaggy prioritised good manners.

Nobody knows what you're talking about...

onetwentysix

Aug 31, 2010

0

#145

polydiatonic wrote:

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

paul211 wrote:

Dumb threads do not exist. The perception of the reader is in cause here.

Some people want to be funny, others inquisitive or challenging or make a statement to get an opinion.

Paul, really? I get your concept here, like: "there are no bad parts, just bad actors". The problem is that by your logic there are also no such things as:

Bad cars, bad breath, bad intentions, bad science, bad chess moves, etc, etc...

Sorry Mahatma, but we live in a world, at least I do, where things (some times know as "reality" are judged based upon our subjective EXPERIENCE. So, that means that what's bad for me might be good for you because of what we, relative to our experiences, take away from that which we are currently experiencing. However, it also means the opposite can be true. Thus what is good for me may be bad for you.

If a mountain lion decided to gnaw your face off, that would be a "bad" experience for you. Sorry, but it really would...even if you ultimately gained some rich experience from the injury later, in the moment it would be bad.

maybe he was 'just' referring to good manners

oh the irony....

go back right up to the top and see how Shaggy prioritised good manners.

Nobody knows what you're talking about...

exactly, read my comment above

and FIRST

giratina999

Aug 31, 2010

0

#146

polydiatonic wrote:

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

giratina999 wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

paul211 wrote:

Dumb threads do not exist. The perception of the reader is in cause here.

Some people want to be funny, others inquisitive or challenging or make a statement to get an opinion.

Paul, really? I get your concept here, like: "there are no bad parts, just bad actors". The problem is that by your logic there are also no such things as:

Bad cars, bad breath, bad intentions, bad science, bad chess moves, etc, etc...

Sorry Mahatma, but we live in a world, at least I do, where things (some times know as "reality" are judged based upon our subjective EXPERIENCE. So, that means that what's bad for me might be good for you because of what we, relative to our experiences, take away from that which we are currently experiencing. However, it also means the opposite can be true. Thus what is good for me may be bad for you.

If a mountain lion decided to gnaw your face off, that would be a "bad" experience for you. Sorry, but it really would...even if you ultimately gained some rich experience from the injury later, in the moment it would be bad.

maybe he was 'just' referring to good manners

oh the irony....

go back right up to the top and see how Shaggy prioritised good manners.

Nobody knows what you're talking about...

yet everybody understands why you should chose to start a thread like this, and to pursue it as you have done....bearing in mind the subject matter of the thread that you chose to create and pursue.

furtiveking

Aug 31, 2010

0

#147

paul211 wrote:

Everyone has a right to post an opinion as long as it is not offending, saying that dumb threads exist, unless thy are offensive, is an offense to the individual thet opened a forum or posted a thread.

Not eveyone has the same perception of things, which people often refer to, wrongly, as intelligence.

I believe that people that post a thread are genuenly and truly interested in obtaining support or ideas or comments.

Some are, yes. But there are a number of trolls who post to either make people angry, or just see how many responses they can get. There are a number of non-offensive, yet dumb posts on the forums (not just here, most places.)

Cystem_Phailure

Aug 31, 2010

0

#148

furtiveking wrote:

But there are a number of trolls who post to either make people angry, or just see how many responses they can get.

And there's a huge difference between those two goals, IMO. Posting a racist or otherwise inflammatory comment is a world removed from those who make frequent posts just to give the usual gang (myself included) a fresh thread for the day where we can meet and swap a few observations and jokes and insults.

polydiatonic

Aug 31, 2010

0

#149

... ....okay Shakespeare, I've reread your comment and I still have freaking idea what you are talking about... .... giratina999 wrote: polydiatonic wrote: giratina999 wrote: polydiatonic wrote: giratina999 wrote: polydiatonic wrote: paul211 wrote: Dumb threads do not exist. The perception of the reader is in cause here. Some people want to be funny, others inquisitive or challenging or make a statement to get an opinion. Paul, really? I get your concept here, like: "there are no bad parts, just bad actors". The problem is that by your logic there are also no such things as: Bad cars, bad breath, bad intentions, bad science, bad chess moves, etc, etc... Sorry Mahatma, but we live in a world, at least I do, where things (some times know as "reality" are judged based upon our subjective EXPERIENCE. So, that means that what's bad for me might be good for you because of what we, relative to our experiences, take away from that which we are currently experiencing. However, it also means the opposite can be true. Thus what is good for me may be bad for you. If a mountain lion decided to gnaw your face off, that would be a "bad" experience for you. Sorry, but it really would...even if you ultimately gained some rich experience from the injury later, in the moment it would be bad. maybe he was 'just' referring to good manners oh the irony.... go back right up to the top and see how Shaggy prioritised good manners. Nobody knows what you're talking about... yet everybody understands why you should chose to start a thread like this, and to pursue it as you have done....bearing in mind the subject matter of the thread that you chose to create and pursue.

ivandh

Aug 31, 2010

0

#150

Like, zoinks!

Cystem_Phailure

Aug 31, 2010

0

#151

And that guy thought I forgot my meds!

polydiatonic

Sep 1, 2010

0

#152

Cystem_Phailure wrote:

And that guy thought I forgot my meds!

Oh now I'm the "that guy", guy. Hey a little respect I am the OP afterall. But seriously sorry about the strange bipolar schizphrenic looking post. It's really not my fault when I post to threads from my ipad that's what ends up happening. Really, it's true. Hey, knock it off. Stop that. Hey did you guys hear that? What was that sound. Okay, I think I'm ok...

dunce

Sep 1, 2010

0

#153

Shut up, voices! . . . Or I'll poke you with the Q-Tip again!

ChessMarkstheSpot

Sep 1, 2010

0

#154

polydiatonic wrote:

Cystem_Phailure wrote:

And that guy thought I forgot my meds!

Oh now I'm the "that guy", guy. Hey a little respect I am the OP afterall. But seriously sorry about the strange bipolar schizphrenic looking post. It's really not my fault when I post to threads from my ipad that's what ends up happening. Really, it's true. Hey, knock it off. Stop that. Hey did you guys hear that? What was that sound. Okay, I think I'm ok...

LOL!!!!! Well, since I am legally bipolar and schizophrenic(not kidding), that sounds like one of the days that I have had. Feel my pain.

polydiatonic

Sep 1, 2010

0

#155

ChessMarkstheSpot wrote:

polydiatonic wrote:

Cystem_Phailure wrote:

And that guy thought I forgot my meds!

Oh now I'm the "that guy", guy. Hey a little respect I am the OP afterall. But seriously sorry about the strange bipolar schizphrenic looking post. It's really not my fault when I post to threads from my ipad that's what ends up happening. Really, it's true. Hey, knock it off. Stop that. Hey did you guys hear that? What was that sound. Okay, I think I'm ok...

LOL!!!!! Well, since I am legally bipolar and schizophrenic(not kidding), that sounds like one of the days that I have had. Feel my pain.

I'm glad you didn't get offended, and that you took my comments in the spirit intended. Extra spam with your eggs, no charge my friend.

El_Gremio

Feb 18, 2011

0

#156

venus

polydiatonic

Feb 20, 2011

0

#157

OmarCayenne wrote:

if you will

What?

kco

Aug 22, 2015

0

#158

bumping this thread for CrystalMoon.

dumbest threads so far would be to greedypawneater's threads, they are so pathetic.

CrystalMoon

Aug 23, 2015

0

#159

GreedyPawnEater is no longer with us. With him went my only hope for Dumbest Thread Candidate.

kco

Aug 23, 2015

0

#160

He could alway get it as a posthumous award.