Can you get into a Maroczy Bind safely from every variation of the Sicilian?

No it’s really not they are pretty equal Black can hold with best play just fine in both lines and has good counterplay in both lines

there is a move order to avoid the prins vs d6 sicilians. 1 e4 c5 2 nf3 d6 3 d4 nf6!?. i use it myself as i play the najdorf and sometimes the dragon. it does allow other lines but white never gets any positional bind anywhere so i'm fine with it. you can try to be clever as white and go for a pseudo smith morra gambit, starting with 2 d4!? which is annoying for black if he plays d6 types and wants to avoid the prins, but after 2..cd4 3 nf3 e5!? prevents you from getting in nxd4 and f3 and is also good enough to diffuse the entire smith morra. you could then think maybe 2 c4 to insist on a bind, but then black can try to exploit d4 here and he does not have to concede d5.

The easiest way to win is to play better than your opponent

If it doesn't bind, turn up the heat.

Against Paulsen's variation with Nf6 (e6,a6,Nf6) you can put a Bd3 instead of Nc3 and then go with c4.

"Gaping hole on d5, no thanks!"

Only Patzers play the Sveshnikov! 

I play the O'Kelly move order exclusively as black. 3. c4 is ok but best if white plays it as a waiting move and doesn't play d4. Then it turns into a struggle to find who can play the biggest number of useful waiting moves and if black plays Nc6, d6 or Be7 then probably white has won that competition and can play d4. But the normal lines after 4. d4 are completely fine for black in the 3. c4 O'Kelly.

That doesn't mean that the Kan/Paulsen isn't superior, although any recognised Sicilian line is fine if black only wants a draw. However, people play the Sicilian to try to win.

The main variation for black to prevent a maroczy is by playing the 2.Nc6 move order. The problem for the maroczy lovers is that this move is quite flexible and may transpose into most sicilians. Therefore if we choose to play open sicilian against this, we will also need to know the main-line theory of the open sicilian. This does not sound attractive so we will need to find a sideline.

The Rossolimo is probably the best objective option.

Generally the Bind was something preferred by white against a black system with a B on g7. It may be that one or two people explored this and thought they found counter-chances for black. However, in some positions a quick Bb4 is good for black and can be followed up by a pawn sac b5 or d5 at the right time, especially with black's Q on c7 pressurising c3. A B on g7 is passive in such positions and doesn't do much. The Maroczy is known to be fairly effective against a Paulsen setup where Black's first moves are c5, e6, dc, a6, Qc7, which is slow. White defends e4 with Bd3 and not Nc3 and can play c4. That's really main line for white against that setup.

I recently switched over to the Kan with immediate success in preparation for the 1500-2000 bracket of rapid players. Mainly, e6 is most flexible, versatile, and practical for club level play (especially where anti-Sicilians occur most frequently). Yes, less theory than the d6 Sicilians but you have to learn how to deal with square weaknesses that would not be present in d6 Sicilians.

The game plans and strategies are more straight forward as well.

When you do understand about square weaknesses, piece placement for both sides, and tempo, there are opportunities to transpose to d6 Sicilians like the Najdorf and Schevenigan, so I don’t feel like I am missing out; I just don’t force it because I counter play  accordingly to whites plans.

Yes, e6 lines. I play 2. ... a6 mainly but it's to get into e6 lines.