An excerpt from my earlier post on what identifies a blog, article, or news section:
"I'm satisfied to say I've once submitted a legitimate news article to chess.com about the ongoing correspondence match between Greg Chamitoff and Stevenson Elementary School; first I posted it as a blog but then deleted that blog post and made it a news story.
I made it a new story because I realized I was giving "chess event coverage" through the article by updating people about what's going on in the game.
Now I'm thinking about regularly posting on my chess.com blog, but what should make me want to post something as a blog rather than an article or news post? Let's say I create a tactical puzzle with analysis given after it; why should I post that as a blog rather than an article and vice versa?
What's the purpose of chess.com blogs if - presuming they're all somewhat chess related - the chess article submission may render the blogs useless?
Please, I'd like to hear the community's insight on this topic.
*Note this is from a old blog post of mine that was never responded to by anyone. "
The strength of this site is, without a question, the community. For all the work that we on staff do, this site truly is nothing with out all the members. With that said, I'd like to ask for the members help to make the site a bit better. Think you have a great idea for a trophy? Share it! How about the surveys on the homepage? Think you can come up with something better than the staff? Give it a shot!
You can post your idea/s here, or you can send me a message, whichever you choose.
For trophy ideas, if you have a piece of clip art to go with it, even better. It's not necessary though.
So, give it your best shot, give us your ideas for trophys and surveys, let's see how creative this community is.