Well, thanks for sharing...it's always good to give nuts the widest coverage possible...
Temper....temper
Sort:
haha probably just mad that you wouldnt talk to him
That is obscene and vulgar and completely inappropriate, especially for a site with children on it; Thank you for posting it so that we can all say how vulgar it is.
I tend to believe such behaviour has less to do with taking chess seriously than with an individual's lack of maturity, insecurity and inability to comprehend that anonymity isn't synonymous with freedom from integrity. A player who takes the game seriously respects the game and his opponent.
its kinda funny though
batgirl wrote:
I tend to believe such behaviour has less to do with taking chess seriously than with an individual's lack of maturity, insecurity and inability to comprehend that anonymity isn't synonymous with freedom from integrity. A player who takes the game seriously respects the game and his opponent.
+1
batgirl wrote:
I tend to believe such behaviour has less to do with taking chess seriously than with an individual's lack of maturity, insecurity and inability to comprehend that anonymity isn't synonymous with freedom from integrity. A player who takes the game seriously respects the game and his opponent.
...until said opponent proves s/he is a cretin undeserving of respect, of course 
Come to think of it, maybe that's who Samantha was playing...
Some people take this game very seriously, do they not ?.
This gentleman, for instance :-
NEW GAME (192082483) - -N- vs. Samantha (10 0 rated) (win: 4, draw: -4, loss: -12)
-N-: lol, you are very good
-N-: if only i had ur skills
-N-: i would be rancd champion
-N-: or somethig
-N-: .... u suck
-N-: and i womt resign
-N-: so...
-N-: up yours
-N-: pathetic
-N-: worm
-N-: i hope u die of cancer
-N-: bludivaddjinalbelch
-N-: die
GAME OVER - -N- vs. Samantha - -N- won on time (-12). Your new blitz rating is 1337.
GAME ANALYSIS - Analyze this game - with your opponent | alone
-N- has left the chat.