Forums

Signs you're a bad chess player

Sort:
e4nf3

You know you could be a grandmaster if you were to put in the time and money. Couple hours a week studying. Maybe a hundred bucks for a good coach.

But, you choose not to because you "have a life".

Besides, really good chess players simply have a fetish...a paroxysmal fetish. Thus, they are to be pitied.

e4nf3

Your all-time favorite chess book is: 

I Was Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse

It was written by your favorite chess player, Joey Casablanca

Chemwong

You grabbed opponent' piece to checkmate your own king and claim victory.

jmose1
bobbyDK wrote:
polarbear2217 wrote:

You are losing the game and when you look up, you notice that your opponent is reading a book. (Happened to me)

your opponent is not allowed to read a book during a chess tournament. how can you tell that he hasn't his chess notes in one of his pages. if it is a chess book he might even have the position in the book that is in the game with best move suggestion and explanation.

who said it was a tournant.

PS.:(

PPS:):):):):):):):)

sabo04

http://www.chess.com/photos/view_album/sabo04/3d-chess-project

BlessedStar

your first move is exd1# and you say you win

Tantale

The difference between a bad player and a good one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ciFTP_KRy4

bronsteinitz

You're so colourblind that you do see the difference between black and white...

blake78613
bronsteinitz wrote:

You're so colourblind that you do see the difference between black and white...

You would be surprised at how well some blind people can play.

Chemwong
bronsteinitz wrote:

You're so colourblind that you do see the difference between black and white...

This is blindness indeed.

Scottrf
bronsteinitz wrote:

You're so colourblind that you do see the difference between black and white...

Or is that true vision? Surprised

bobtehnoob

Oh! I've got one!

When you're playing someone, you spend all your time chatting about how they're American, gay, and deserve to be put to jail!

And then, when you know you're going to lose, you stall for 10 minutes, and spen the time commenting on the grammar of someone playing from an iPad!

Then, before you lose, you call your opponent a bunch of synonyms for female genitilia!

gaereagdag

When you think that a chess rating of 1000 makes you a talent of exceptional ability and potential.

sabo04

http://www.chess.com/photos/view_album/sabo04/3d-chess-project

gaereagdag

Rooks need scope. The early moves 1.h4 and 1.a4 are excellent for bringing these powerful pices into the game via R a3 and Rh3. The queens to join in to. Queen in the centre is good. And a last point. Castling is bad. Very bad. Your king is safest in the centre because having put your rooks and queens in the centre as early as possiblke, your king will be protected being behind your pieces.

AndyClifton

This thread should come with its own emergency oxygen supply (for those of us who get out of breath from laughing).

pogorelich

You have difficulty understanding the difference between a piece sac and a hung piece.

jposthuma

You know you are a bad chess player when:

1.The only way you can avoid losing is not playing at all.

2.You get checkmated like this:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.You resign as white in this position because you did not se any way to stop Rf1#

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.You take pieces from your opponent whenever you can because you like playing with them on the side of the board.

coalescenet

nice jposthuma! 100th page and 2000 post both coming up soon Surprised

AndyClifton

Yeah, that was positively Cowardesque.