Having just viewed a game (time control 30|15) between two players rated much righer than myself, I couldn't help but wonder why I was thinking of what I found to be improvements on the game. So after it had ended, I decided to make my own analysis of the game. Inserted are a few of the variations I had thoughts of while viewing the game. I'm sure I will find myself in a pool of corrections, but as long as the are constructive, they are greatly appreciated.

So without further adu:

i just like to play professional analyst even though i am really nobody that i know ofhehe.......... anyways, i just want to keep it simple. from my analysis, "everything is precious"!! notice that in the end, even 1 pawn advantage over your opponent means that you may be promoted to another piece that wins the game instead of being forced to draw

I am humble you think so. Anyways, I know it is only my personal opinion. Thank you anyways for the kind words!!

The point of this post was to have someone give me instructive critisism; to point out where I overlooked something in hops that in the future I can apply some of these ideas to my own play. Also, I'm not sure if you even looked at the diagram. Who actually won is not the point of this post at all. It rarely is when analyzing a game. Rather, the meaning is showing where one believes any improvements could be made for learning purposes. And I do appreciate what echecs said if he was in fact, being serious, but I would almost like more for someone to provide counter analysis.

I think I've gone on long enough.

Thanks, hope you see the true point of the topic,

NjChristian