Forums

I can hoenstly say I'm disgusted

Sort:
Scottrf

To be fair, he's just a troll, and not the worst around.

knightkrawlirr
pullin wrote:

By how many games I've lost to much inferior opponents by pressuring me into defeat. 

If you want to win games without intellectualism, but by thug tactics.. I guess that's the kind of player you are

some people don't care and are enabled by who or whatever.......people will use whatever advantage they can find however it can be used regardless of whether it's fair or not and they'll keep doing it as long as they can get away with it. don't expect them to care what you think of them or what they are doing; they won't and in fact they'll use this to manipulate and deceive you.

ppandachess
pullin wrote:

By how many games I've lost to much inferior opponents by pressuring me into defeat. 

If you want to win games without intellectualism, but by thug tactics.. I guess that's the kind of player you are

Hi, Tactics are part of the game, "a means to achieve your strategy", so

I think that's an important part of the game...hope that helps

http://chess-teacher.com/1632.html

huluvuz

lal

diphenhydramine
EscherehcsE wrote:

Mister T tactics?

"Resign, fool!!!"

Lol! :P

TheGreatOogieBoogie
pullin wrote:

By how many games I've lost to much inferior opponents by pressuring me into defeat. 

If you want to win games without intellectualism, but by thug tactics.. I guess that's the kind of player you are

If the position calls for it then why not?  If it's trappy anti-positional chess then you should familiarize yourself with real chess as opposed to hope chess. Analyze every possible check, capture, and threat, and decide candidate moves based off a plan, and base a plan off the positional imbalances (breaking a position into its smallest individual units such as weak squares and color complexes, pawn structure, knight against a bishop, bishop and rook vs. queen, material imbalance, center type, etc.) and evaluate who is better, by how much, and why. 

mrhjornevik
dstokkink wrote:

Dodger111 wrote:

After looking at your rating I have to ask:

How do you even find an inferior player? 

 

Good question!

ahhh you miss the point. Ofcours the ratings are wrong. People keep on doing moves he disaprovs of, such as mating him and his rating suffer under this unfair burden. If we had just stuck to his list of preapproved moves he would have beaten us all and the rating would have been more fair. .