if you know

No.

It is a case-to-case scenario. One would be a fool to lose a strong attacking initiative or an important tactical opportunity just to castle for the sake of castling.

True.

I think kurogkug is asking wether Kasparov has a weakness, and if that weakness reveals itself when he can't castle.

I wouldn't think Kasparov has any weakness.

BTW, here's an interesting short interview:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2KKfOGaR_w

I was going to suggest to fire up Chessbase or Chess Assitant with a decent-sized database to find all the games where the winning side didn't castle but still won against a castled king.

It would be a perfect set of examples irregardless if it was Kasparov who pulled it off or not.

exactly,and im glad that you understand me bgangioni.and i understand what borgqueen's hatred it is,may be borgqueen is idolizing kasparov.i been idolizing kasparov too.

Again, use a database this time to search for all of Kasparov's games where he lost.

I doubt if that will be of any use because he does not have a consistent pattern to his loses. It only proves that he can be outplayed and occassionally blunders.

im sorry if i said that you have a hatred borgqueen.i respect kasparov too.and i thank you that you answer my question.

hi borgqueen i have another question.i want you to teach me how to put a sentence in this ''post to reply''.i mean like what you did in your last response to me you highlighted my question in you put it to this ''post your reply'' before you response again.i wait again to your response borgqueen.

you should have ask him that 88 pages ago.

kurogkug means nothing is just when we play basketball here in the philippines and my friends invented that word and when i ask them what is the meaning of the word they just say nothing.so we name that word in our team.the 2nd question is i dont understand because theirs no california philippines here,may be a street name here.yes your right borgqueen that was my question,and its look like its very hard to do.i have a question again to you borgqueen,and dont think again that i want to go back,my question is ''what is the meaning of ''strategic effort''?,because i watch a movie about war again and the general said this words.is this effort is involve in strategy of the general?.can you give me an example?.

thank you borgqueen.i think i dont need to fix my profile because it is a remembrance to me when i went to california before as a tourist and came back again here in philippines after 1 month of roaming around there.

LOL you're a genius.

It's not hard at all, just click the button that says QUOTE, right under this message, and see what happens.

will there be a riot if they make a flag for california phillipines?

ask ilikeflags

hi borgqueen,i have a question that i forgot to ask you last 2 days ago and again i dont want you to think that i want to go back.i understand your answer about the meaning of ''strategic effort''.so is this mean that it is involve in the strategy every time we use the word strategic in the first word of two words or not?,i mean like for example the words ''strategic effort'' means the word effort is involve in strategy,the words ''strategic importance'' the word importance is involve in strategy,the words ''strategic plan'' the word plan is involve in strategy.am i right or wrong borgqueen?.i wait again to your response borgqueen.

I would say "california Philippines" means the member is living in California but is a Philippino national. That's the way it comes out in the profiles, and may explain the apparent "non-sense" of these nationality tags.

I could have put "South Africa Scotland" but differentiated it by putting "Res.(ident)" in front of South Africa, then "Scotland" which I intend to mean that "I reside in South Africa but am a Scottish national".

I must have missed some of his posts (or forgotten them)!

 now now that is no excuse....now you will have to go back and read it from the beginning   ;-)

I did, but gave up on page five...