Tactics trainer question

Hi, all! I hope the community can clarify something for me. I'm having a little trouble understanding the tactics trainer for one reason. Occasionally, there will be a problem that results in lines that are not forced. In fact, the computer makes some of the worst possible moves while in a variation that isn't forced at all. Thus ending in the puzzle solver emerging with a significant material advantage. Sometimes the computer will have forcing moves at the beginning or middle of the exchanges that would change the outcome greatly in their favor or atleast equalizing. I'm very confused about how to read the trainer. Thank you in advance for your help and insight :)

could you post an example maybe you overlook something.

Good idea , Bobby. I will post the annotation on next example

I had a few similar cases where the moves were not exactly forced as well. I thought it was strange at first and studied the position further. I found that in said case the computer was not impelled to reply with after said move and furthermore said move was not in accordance with any said material gains. That being said the evidence suggests to the jury that said tactic does not comply with tactical guidelines and should be stricken from the tactics in the case of the erroneous tactic.

said in accordance to tactical enjoyment proclamations. Set aside said arrangement for branded accompaniment, the felonious endeavor was marketed outside said infringement deliberately slated from said puzzle to question audacity, and this very day, dated 31 January the year 2015, said article will be procured to the defending counselors pending tactic retrieval in said document, from said article in the bylaws of tactics 99% of which occur in a given game unstated number of time. To be developed as a written clause to amend said article, for the deductive tactic without cause or injury said article found in forums, read by many. sed.

Lmao. Well said

tactical oversight oversight sed.