Hi Club,
In a previous post to the forum, I pondered the question as to what a good accuracy would be. Here's a sample game using the Fort Knox Defense and the accuracy of two masters. I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that an accuracy of 85-ish and higher is "master-level" play. The game itself isn't particularly exciting, but it is illustrative of a typical Fort Knox game.
Rookin2Good
Mar 19, 2019
Hi Club!
It looks like chess.com has made an upgrade to their analysis graphics. They have also expanded how they classify the quality of moves. One of mine here is considered... brilliant. We also get an overall accuracy score. Since this is my first accuracy score, I'm not sure what is considered good. I assume 100 is perfect, my score was a 91.0.... so close to perfect?
Anyway, the game posted after the graphic here shows a trap that could happen in a Queen's Gambit Declined position. I didn't think it would work, but I had to give it a try. Check it out.
Rookin2Good
Mar 19, 2019
Hi Club!
This game shows how quick development can lead to an advantage over a player with slow development. Thought the advantage gained does not have a major impact on the game until move 19 or so, the result is a winning position for me. Black drops a bishop and then a rook because his pawns are all pushed forward and his pieces were left on the back rank.
Rookin2Good
Jan 7, 2019
Hi Everyone!
The World Championship has begun! Round 1 is over and Caruana vs Carlsen is tied at 1/2 - 1/2. There is a link to a commentary on the game, but I included my own notes in this game file.
Here's a link to a few videos on youtube:
chesswebsite
chessnetwork
Have a great week!
Mr. P.
Rookin2Good
Nov 10, 2018
Admins
Super Admins
