Forum

I like the way I pulled this attack off. I had a lot of help from my opponent but the bishop circling to a2 with the queen on b3 aiming at a kingside castled king might be an attacking theme I might use in the future. It is common for me to try to get the queen in front of the bishop to attack kingside and I may of just found a way to do it.

We will start with an example of Nimzowitch's concept of overprotection: We should probabl start with 4.Qg4

The whole purpose of this group is for our members to grow in chess together. In order to accomplish this, I propose a training schedule built around topics that the members want to learn. We will need active participation in order to be successful. The training will consist of all parts of the game. We will move to the next topic as soon as we feel comfortable with the current one. This is the idea I have, but I need your contributions and ideas. First things first, we need some topics to start with.

Post links to websites you have found that are good chess resources. An example and one of my favorites: http://www.chessgames.com/

A few things: Organization of forums Update to group details More members These are a few things I have been contemplating how to change. I'm not sure I like the name Accurate Chess either. I like our logo and our activity is up to par. I think we are building off each other. What do y'all think?

The opening dictacts the direction the game is heading. Getting the advantage by playing a better opening position is very beneficial. What openings do you like to use to try for that opening advantage? My picks as white: Queens Gambit Declined or Accepted, King's Indian Attack, Ruy Lopez My picks as black: Nimzo-Indian Defense, Scandinavian Defense, Caro-Kann, French Defense

Endgames are my weakest point, so this topic will be devoted to instructive endgame positions and themes. Ill start off with a position i reached in one of my recent games where i threw away a win after i simplified everything and ended up with an advantage, but was unable to convert it into a win, and in fact blundered it into a loss.

An excerpt from Randy Bauer's review of "The Improving Annotater" - "The premise of the book is that annotating your own games can help you to play better chess. By examining the choices you made during the game – and how they turned out – you can pinpoint the flaws in your thinking process so that you can work on them. This is an accepted premise among most chess teachers and trainers, and it was advice I also received as a young aspiring player from an early chess mentor, USCF expert and national TD Paul D. Shannon. In fact, I spent a lot of time in my formative years engaged in the same activity discussed in this book." This topic is dedicated to posting and discussing your annotated games.

http://www.chess-theory.com/images_links/202p_always_chess.jpg http://www.google.com/imgres?um=1&hl=en&tbm=isch&tbnid=mM9ukwTFQLOzKM:&imgrefurl=http://www.myfootstepsinchess.com/weekly-review-report-1/&docid=5N-R6iYGweeT1M&imgurl=http://www.myfootstepsinchess.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/chess-study-Posteres.jpg&w=400&h=320&ei=1tLrT8ufJrOA2AW8_IS7AQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=110&vpy=141&dur=579&hovh=201&hovw=251&tx=99&ty=115&sig=106098446460514827642&page=1&tbnh=127&tbnw=152&start=0&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:76&biw=1241&bih=606 Any other ideas?

Post books that are instructive. Positional Chess Handbook is a good one. A preview can be found here: books.google.com/books?id=aII2bMqZQY8C&printsec=frontcover#v

GM Dzindzichashvili has a video series on youtube that is very helpful in helping you get a better way of thinking while you play. This is one of the games he discusses. For a more in depth look at this game and some excellent analysis visit http://www.youtube.com/user/SpectreStillRoaming the series this game was taken from is called "How to think and play like a GM"

Petrosian is a good player to look at. In this game he is up against a strong positional player. Neither one of these players made any blunders that I can see. Petrosian read the position better and came out ahead. I think that this is very instructional in that it came down to two different strategies and the better one won. Here is my overview of the key points for black: 5..Bg4 was an inaccuracy I believe because it severely limits the knight on f6. I think grabbing space with 5..e5 would be better. 25..Qd8 I don't like this move. I think the queen needs to remain flexible in this position and making the "weak" b pawn the focal point isn't something that seems good to me. I would like 25..a4 with the idea of outposting the knight on b3 and then maybe trying to attack the b pawn. This would of lead to a better game for black in my opinion. Everything else seems good to me. Black gets a bad knight and his pieces get hemmed up on the queenside while white stays mobile and is able to execute a winning attack against the black king. The attack: White secures a bishop pair vs knight and bishop and then shows his mobility attacking both sides as he pleases. The focal points are the b file and the h file. The difference is that black's pieces become more passive as they try to attack the focal point where as white's become more active. As soon as the black queen becomes passively spotted on the b3 square, white opens lines towards black's king and uses his more active pieces to attack. Picking the right focal point to attack and keeping your pieces actively placed is a big part of chess (as I believe this game shows).

A good one I read is about using "chunks". You know the problem. You have been studying chess for several years now. Yet somehow you don't seem to improve. You have bought Michael de la Maza's book and read it. You have read "Improve Your Chess Now" and "The Inner Game of Chess". You have read "Think Like A Grandmaster". These books inspired you. But they didn't make you stronger. Why not? Why do you still blunder in strong positions. Why did you miss that fork when you were playing a young and talented junior who knows absolutely no chess theory (ouch that hurts)???? Today, cognitive science has helped us to understand this. The reason strong players analyse better than weak players is because of a principle known as "chunking" - just another name for pattern recognition. To improve, you need to learn more patterns or chunks. I will explain what chunks are in a minute. To become a master, it is estimated that you need to have about 50,000 chunks in your memory. However, herein lies the problem as well. To gain 400 rating points, you probably need to learn 10-times as many chunks or patterns as you know now. A player rated 1800 FIDE may easily recognize 5,000 chunks... 1400 FIDE would be 500 chunks and so forth.... So as you improve, the rate of progress decreases because you need to know much more. Does that sound familiar? Strong players can visualize the board better than weak players because they can divide the board up into big chunks. A chunk is a pattern. A grouping of pieces that is seen as a single big chunk. Let me give you the very basic idea here. Suppose I asked you to remember the following string of numbers: 121643681. Could you do it easily? OK, now try chunking the information. Remember the numbers in groups. 121 64 36 81. Is that easier? OK, now suppose I tell you that each group is the square of some simple number (121 is the square of 11, 64 the square of 8, 36 of 6 and 81 of 9). Now it is much easier again, because you recognize the patterns. They are pre-existing patterns that you have already learnt. A castled king position for example (Kg1, Rf1, Pf2, Pg2, Ph2, Nf3) might be a chunk. It is easy to remember isn't it? Despite the fact that there are 6 pieces on 6 out of the 64 squares on the chessboard, you could set the position up in a flash if asked to do so. Someone who has never seen a castled king configuration (with a trusty knight on f3) would have trouble remembering it, but for you, it is easy, right? Here is the key to visualization. All you need to do is be familiar with the chunk. You store chunks in long-term memory but you process them through short-term (working) memory (involving brain structures such as the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus). It has been estimated that you can store up to about 7 chunks in working memory at any one time, but the most recent studies suggest that it is closer to 3 chunks, not 7. For that reason, to visualize the entire board and hold it in working memory, you need to see the entire position in only 3 chunks at most. Therefore, chunks need to be quite large. More realistically, you probably work with 3 chunks at any one time and process information rapidly between working memory and long term memory in order to visualize the entire board. You need to see and be familiar with groupings of pieces. Knowing typical pawn structures helps in particular. For example, as a junior, I spent a lot of time studying the isolated queen pawn positions that arise out of the QGD and Caro-Kann openings. There are typical placements of both pawns and pieces. You get to know where they belong and can visualize their positions (and where they can move to with effect) fairly easily. This then is the key to becoming a strong chess player. Learn chess positions, and learn lots of them. And of course, learn what moves work in these positions and what moves are poor. The learning of patterns or chunks is dependent on two basic principles: repetition and timing. Studies show that frequent repetition of a training stimulus helps in learning the stimulus pattern. For this reason, I recommend the study of related structures, which helps to reinforce the concept better. Study games with similar pawn structures. Note that the key here is to learn patterns. Solving problems helps to learn a pattern, but my recommendation is to learn the pattern first and then reinforce this with problem solving. In other words, if you want to learn a tactical pattern, don't spend too much time solving it in the first instance. It is better to spend a minute or two on it, look up the solution and then come back to it later (in 5 minutes) and see if you remember it. Recent published electrophysiology experiments from Mu-ming Poo's group shows that maximum reinforcement is achieved when the stimulus is repeated within 3-5 minute intervals. My recommendation for study then is to examine a large number of master games, all with similar or related structures, reading through them 2-3 times at 5 minute intervals. Read through the game quickly and then read through slowly studying the notes. The third time, see if you can recall the moves of the game and remember the main strategic and tactical themes in your mind's eye. Of course it is also possible to train working memory, but only in a limited way. Recent studies suggest that working memory can be improved by exercises, but it is fairly pattern specific. That means that the training task must be similar to the memory task. One way to do this is to try blindfold chess. Set up a chess board in front of you and read through the first 10-15 moves of the game. Now stop moving the pieces and keep reading the game. Can you visualise the next 10-20 moves? With practice you should be able to do this. Bear in mind that this exercise is like flexing your muscles. It gets you in shape but ultimate progress in chess study depends upon your ability to learn new patterns. There are basically 6 types of patterns you need to learn: 1) Opening patterns, 2) early middlegame patterns (where planning is tightly controlled by the specific pawn structure), 3) positional patterns (learning to place pieces and pawns on their optimal squares), 4) tactical patterns, 5) Strategic endgame patterns and 6) technical endgame patterns. So which should you study first? A chess trainer can help you there, by showing you where you are weakest. If you don't have a trainer, then a close analysis of your own games may help you to decide what you are weakest at.

Smyslov was a great player in his prime. Here is a link to a game of his already covered on chess.com. http://blog.chess.com/benws/subtle-play

i figure we should start off with a few karpov games, considering that hes known as the best positional player. Here is Anatoli Karpov vs. Evgeny Gik