How are people rated like 500-600?

Sort:
BongcloudAttacks
Ronnee wrote:

Well if you are interrupted during play incessantly you DROP in score.

If you start a game and need to rush to another task ...game abandonment you drop in score. However I really think that some players CANNOT ...are not euipped brain wise to handle chess moves. You must remember this is chess requires an enhanced RIGHT BRAIN hemisphere. If you have an enlarged RIGHT BRAIN you will be a good player. Some ambidextrous players who have EQUALLY enhanced RIGHT and LEFT brain hemispheres play better. Homosexuals actually have a wider corpus collosum connecting the 2 brains and you find these people are quite clever. JUST LIKE there are MATHS dummies and LANGUAGE dummies ...the same applies to chess.   Greta Chess players are not better than PRIME MINISTERS or top athletes ...they only play chess with ease 

I doubt that Anish Giri has any right brain on his head

BongcloudAttacks
AIM-AceMove wrote:
I_Am_Second wrote:

0-1000 Player has just learned the game, they constantly leave pieces en prise, and make many blunders. Player has no tactical, endgame, or positional knowledge. Absolutely No evaluation or analytical skills.

1000-1100 Beginning player now has several games under their belt. They have very basic tactical knowledge and they continue to make blunders and to leave pieces en prise. Plays without plan.

1100-1200 Beginning player continues to make many blunders. At this level they have learned basic tactics. Occasionally leaves pieces en prise, but this is not a common occurrence. Sometimes plays with a plan, but the plan is usually incorrect. At this point the player sees many offensive tactics but they miss most defensive tactics.

1200-1300 Player begins to understand that chess is a two player game, and begins to ask what the opponent’s last move is threatening. Blunders still occur but less frequently. One major reason for their rating increase, is that player stops leaving pieces en prise. Player has intermediate tactical skills but still misses many defensive tactical shots. Starts to build an opening repertoire, which gets them into the middlegame with a better position. Very limited endgame and positional skills. Starts making better plans due to limited endgame and positional knowledge.

1300-1400 Advanced beginner. Players at this level have reached an intermediate thought process. player Looks for Checks, Captures and threats after opponents moves. Does not leave pieces en prise. Very good with offensive tactics and improving on the defensive tactics side, but still misses some. Still building opening repertoire. Starts learning basic endgame and middlegame strategy, but knowledge is still very basic. This level is an important milestone for the beginning chess player because they are on the verge of being an intermediate player.

1400-1500 Intermediate level player. Good thought process, does not leave pieces en prise. Advanced tactically, both on offense and defense (might occasionally miss a defensive tactic). Has an opening repertoire and plays pet openings. Has intermediate endgame, positional and analysis skills. One of the reasons for low rating is players poor positional evaluation abilities. Will probably need a chess coach to improve further.

1500-1700 Advanced intermediate player. Advanced tactical skills and thought process. Player has Intermediate endgame and positional skills at this stage. Intermediate positional evaluation and analysis skills. Should have a chess trainer, and play against strong opposition in order to improve as well as a strong focus on the endgame, positional and evaluation skills.

1700-1900 Near expert level player. Advanced tactical skills and thought process. Very strong endgame and positional skills. Intermediate evaluation skills. Very good analyst. Player needs to continue focusing on evaluation and analysis skills. Opening theory knowledge becomes an important component for further improvement. Player has a good database of structures that that can help them when they reach unfamiliar positions in OTB play. Player should reach expert level in approximately 2 more years, which falls in line with expert theory which claims that it takes 10 years to become an expert in any field.

I did not had any plan really or opening(as black after 1.d4 d5 he plays Bf4 and i was like what strange opening, maybe he wants to sac on c7...) , or tactical or endgame knowledge (besides common checkmates, forget about king and pawn endgame zero knowledge) until i reached 1400-1500. To reach 1500 you need two things. General opening principle and safe check. Check if it is safe after each move. Thats it. Havent study patterns or tactics or strategy. Just put 2 pawns at center, develop pieces and castle and try not to blunder. And with black i played ugly stuff. For example 1.e4 d5 and then exd5 and i play 2...e5! (many did not know an pasant rule!) I played my own opening moves to get out of book my opponents early to have a mess on the board so i can take all the free pieces they give me.

I analyze my games with computers and i am 1300-1400 i have to say that description is pretty accurate and i see can relate to my games in the present and in the past 

Kadometer

I am an actual 500 player and kinda embarrassed of my rating. It's been two weeks and I only climbed 100 :'(

Methaluan

My theory: Players that are good but have bad internet connections. They lose lots of score because they abandon but can pack a punch if they manage make the whole match. You can often find them at tournaments.

Can also be a matter of concentration. If I am focused I play ok for my rating of mid 700. But a few weeks ago I tried to play chess with background music and lost 100 rating in a hour down to a grand total of 670 rating with 10 defeats in a row. I can only imagine people that have a busy households with kids and such.

BK201YI
Methaluan wrote:

My theory: Players that are good but have bad internet connections. They lose lots of score because they abandon but can pack a punch if they manage make the whole match. You can often find them at tournaments.

Can also be a matter of concentration. If I am focused I play ok for my rating of mid 700. But a few weeks ago I tried to play chess with background music and lost 100 rating in a hour down to a grand total of 670 rating with 10 defeats in a row. I can only imagine people that have a busy households with kids and such.

Nope. Some people are just bad at chess. When I signed up, my rating was very low. I had good internet connection and was concentrating well, but I still made bad decisions. BTW, having a low rating doesn't mean that you shuffle pieces around randomly. It means that you check your opponent's king and shout "CHECK!" as if that was a big accomplishment and your piece is promptly captured. You don't care, because you don't know that being a piece down can spell disaster. You also have no knowledge of prophylactic moves whatsoever. It all comes down to making bad decisions and not being able to see even one or two moves ahead. 

Destroyer942

I came from about 850 to 1450. Nothing spectacular but just saying if you're stuck at the bottom now doesn't mean you can't climb up.

maverick82d

I was looking at someones rating that had a post not so long ago that was exactly 800 and had just joined that same day. Doesnt everyone start at 1200 ?

Methaluan

I joined recently and I think it depends if you pick New to Chess, Beginner, etc when you join. I picked beginner and started with 1000.

Scottrf

Wow, the amount of banned players in this thread...

LionVanHalen

Main answer is darwinism... some peoples are too dumb for Chess, or too impatient. 

Sorry, is not pc answer, but...

Elroch
Scottrf wrote:

Wow, the amount of banned players in this thread...

Are there? The closed accounts on the first page don't have fair play violation indications.

Scottrf

Yeah that’s what the red cross is, it’s just not explicitly stated on old accounts. If they had closed themselves it would be a grey cross.

GM_chess_player
Kadometer wrote:

I am an actual 500 player and kinda embarrassed of my rating. It's been two weeks and I only climbed 100 :'(

Hey, that's good! 

Climbing 100 points in 2 weeks is nice. 

I was 1100 in December, and look at me now! 1300.

Now, all you need to do is find a coach.

Here are some coaches I can recommend to you happy.png

@Medvegy (GM)

@TheButcher (IM) Officially highest world rank for coaches.

Here are some more coaches you can find:

https://www.chess.com/coaches



gabrichidze

Living all this IQ discussions alone(ability to play chess is NOT a sign of high IQ mind you, otherwise best chess players would be also best scientists and vise versa), often are caused by wired chess.com system. If you are new at chess.com you are usually assigned the rating 1200, but if you lose a game you have 50 for a first dozen games or so point taken away, so many people fell below 800 this way. Plus many people dont take chess.com very seriously, abandon games when something else coes along etc, so they rating goes down too.

MannyChin
learning2mate wrote:

Don't poke at us beginners. Not everyone has the time or desire to master chess.

Yessir

SteveMini

I started at about 600ish rating. I lost two games and now i'm 237. LOL. Didn't expect to start this low. Oh well. I'm in no rush. I'm studying every day and playing a few games. But 1,000 seems really far away. It'll definitely be an accomplishment if I can get that high within the next few weeks.

vatj0

 I'm on a speed run to 200, lets go!

vatj0

 Tambe, OP, your original question does not make a lot of sense, heres another, similar question: why are some chess players rated 2500+ and others are not? (please don't answer). Another thing to consider is the saying - if you don't start somewhere, you won't get anywhere. I mean, did you make this thread for a snide chortle at beginner chess players because whether you did or not, inevitably and predictably thats kind of how its gone and if you can imagine it, consider that some of these players will end up being very strong players in future and they will crush you.

Elroch
SteveMini wrote:

I started at about 600ish rating. I lost two games and now i'm 237. LOL. Didn't expect to start this low. Oh well. I'm in no rush. I'm studying every day and playing a few games. But 1,000 seems really far away. It'll definitely be an accomplishment if I can get that high within the next few weeks.

As a beginner you would learn more by playing more slowly, so you see more before moving. One way is to play as many daily games as suits you - this allows trying out ideas on an analysis board before playing them. Another is to play slower time controls.

Felis_Domesticus

True