Kasparov: my great predecessors



These books will not teach you much, if anything at all. They are not meant to be used as chess improvement, but rather a historical progression of the game via many of its greatest players. However, this is done more so through the games themselves with extensive analysis. Personally I would have preferred more history on the players and places of their individual times. Less analysis, and greater emphasis on each style and how they used it to great affect. As for a purely learning mechanism I suggest almost anything else but this series.
I meant to buy this series of books some months ago but never did. Does anyone have these books? Would you recommend them? What sort of information could be obtained from the analysis, like, is there a concentration on openings, middlegames, endgames, or simply all three. Is it important to buy/read the first book of the series first!? ...and value for money??
Thats alot of question right? I know these books will improve my game and also prove an interesting read, but if you have read them im just looking for your thoughts having read them.