A Bust to the Sicilian Defense

Sort:
Avatar of SaltyAsHell
blueemu wrote:

The Alapin moves a Pawn instead of a piece, preempts the best square that the b1-Knight had available, makes the c1-Bishop less valuable, and weakens d3 and the light squares generally.

This guy busted this stupid post on comment 5 and it's still going LOL

Avatar of staples13
SaltyAsHell wrote:
blueemu wrote:

The Alapin moves a Pawn instead of a piece, preempts the best square that the b1-Knight had available, makes the c1-Bishop less valuable, and weakens d3 and the light squares generally.

This guy busted this stupid post on comment 5 and it's still going LOL

And I refuted his analysis on comment 6

Avatar of SaltyAsHell
staples13 wrote:
SaltyAsHell wrote:
blueemu wrote:

The Alapin moves a Pawn instead of a piece, preempts the best square that the b1-Knight had available, makes the c1-Bishop less valuable, and weakens d3 and the light squares generally.

This guy busted this stupid post on comment 5 and it's still going LOL

And I refuted his analysis on comment 6

You refuted nothing at all in this whole thread. And if you think that you refuted the highest scoring response to e4 you are stupid.

Avatar of staples13

E4 not e5. I score 70 % against the Sicilian, so yes I have busted it

Avatar of staples13

This thread is full of dozens of games where I analyzed specific lines, and presented common ideas, traps and tactics found in the Alapin. This thread is by far the most informative discussion of the Alapin on chess.com

Avatar of staples13
Chessopera wrote:

Almost all top GMs play open sicilian which means that is the best. Anti-sicilian is best at club level although from time to time in also appears at master level.

Deep blue destroyed Kasparov with the Alapin. The strongest chess engines choose and have great success with the Alapin and they are much stronger than GM’s

Avatar of staples13
Chessopera wrote:

Deep Blue can destroy anyone with any opening against Sicilian. Computers win the game not in the opening but in middle and endgame therefore the choice of opening is irrelavent due to computers superiority over humans in middle and endgame. 

Nope. False. Kasparov destroyed Deep Blue in their 1996 match. The only game Deep Blue managed to win was when it played the Alapin. Try again

Avatar of kindaspongey
staples13 wrote:

... I score 70 % against the Sicilian, so yes I have busted it

Would a person score 100% with knowledge of how to force a win?

Avatar of kindaspongey
staples13 wrote:

... Deep blue destroyed Kasparov with the Alapin. ...

Is there any reason to suppose that either of them played perfectly?

Avatar of SaltyAsHell
kindaspongey wrote:
staples13 wrote:

... I score 70 % against the Sicilian, so yes I have busted it

Would a person score 100% with knowledge of how to force a win?

I checked his profile and he is probably cheating so trust me doesn't have a 70% win ratio neither he busted it.

Avatar of SaltyAsHell
staples13 wrote:
Chessopera wrote:

Almost all top GMs play open sicilian which means that is the best. Anti-sicilian is best at club level although from time to time in also appears at master level.

Deep blue destroyed Kasparov with the Alapin. The strongest chess engines choose and have great success with the Alapin and they are much stronger than GM’s

Engines don't go for the Alapin, they go for the open Sicilian. You are wrong again.

Avatar of staples13
kindaspongey wrote:
staples13 wrote:

... I score 70 % against the Sicilian, so yes I have busted it

Would a person score 100% with knowledge of how to force a win?

Yes, but i play very fast time controls so I blunder sometimes, so I only score 70%

Avatar of HolographWars
staples13 wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:
staples13 wrote:

... I score 70 % against the Sicilian, so yes I have busted it

Would a person score 100% with knowledge of how to force a win?

Yes, but i play very fast time controls so I blunder sometimes, so I only score 70%

I also have about 60-70% score vs Sicilian with my grand prix against approx. 1600 otb opposition. So I also think I busted it.

Avatar of staples13

What’s the Grand Prix is that where you play an early f4? 

That also seems like a good response. Go after black on his undeveloped kingside. It’s probably inaccurate though because it gives black drawing chances.

Avatar of staples13

Perhaps the grand prix is a forced win as well. I don’t know since I don’t play it. I’ll defer to your expertise on the line

Avatar of GANHEII

so you try to refute something playing blitz and bullet, yeah 3 minutes non increment  are the rules of thumb 4 the theory, so i will win a bullet game with e4? a5!!as black and say it refutes e4 cause e4 fails to occupie the Queen side

Avatar of HolographWars
staples13 wrote:

Perhaps the grand prix is a forced win as well. I don’t know since I don’t play it. I’ll defer to your expertise on the line

Has been played by me for almost a year consistently now. With enourmous successes. 

Avatar of IMKeto

I busted a move once...

Avatar of staples13
josecarlos33 wrote:

so you try to refute something playing blitz and bullet, yeah 3 minutes non increment  are the rules of thumb 4 the theory, so i will win a bullet game with e4? a5!!as black and say it refutes e4 cause e4 fails to occupie the Queen side

JoseCarlos I don’t blame you for being skeptical. I do ask that you keep an open mind though. 

I looked at your games and I see you really struggle against the Sicilian Defense, as black scores almost 50% against you with it. My recommendation to you would be to take up the Alapin and learn from the games, analysis, and tips I have posted in this thread so that way you can start scoring well against the Sicilian too!

Avatar of HolographWars

The practical upside for the Grand Prix is that it may start slowly, but suddenly explodes into a devastating attack like the “boiling frog”.