A Bust to the Sicilian Defense - Chess Forums - Page 48

dawson_632

Jul 30, 2019

0

#941

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

1 e4 c5 2 c3 e5 … im on a winning streak otb with this variation. ,,,

"Both 2...Nf6 and 2...d5 are fine against the Alapin, and some players may also like 2...e6 or 2...g6." - IM pfren (September 4, 2018)

i dont think e5 was aa mistake anyways, i sacrificed a pawn for aggressive play

kindaspongey

Jul 30, 2019

0

#942

staples13 wrote (August 27, 2018):

... d5 and nf6 do provide much stiffer resistance than any of black's other responses. ...

dawson_632

Jul 30, 2019

0

#943

kindaspongey wrote:

staples13 wrote (August 27, 2018):

... d5 and nf6 do provide much stiffer resistance than any of black's other responses. ...

again, he didnt lose from his second move. he didnt defend his f pawn thats why he lost. you cannot discredit my alapin game becaus he played e5

dawson_632

Jul 30, 2019

0

#944

another sicilian player falls victim,

kindaspongey

Jul 30, 2019

0

#945

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

1 e4 c5 2 c3 e5 … im on a winning streak otb with this variation. ,,,

"Both 2...Nf6 and 2...d5 are fine against the Alapin, and some players may also like 2...e6 or 2...g6." - IM pfren (September 4, 2018)

i dont think e5 was aa mistake ...

"?!" - GM Evgeny Sveshnikov (2010)

kindaspongey

Jul 30, 2019

0

#946

dawson_632 wrote:

… again, he didnt lose from his second move. … you cannot discredit my alapin game becaus he played e5

I made no claim about Black losing from the second move or the game being discredited.

kindaspongey

Jul 30, 2019

0

#947

dawson_632 wrote:

... he didnt defend his f pawn thats why he lost. ...

So, it is not being claimed that Black lost because of 1...c5 ?

HolographWars

Jul 30, 2019

0

#948

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

... he didnt defend his f pawn thats why he lost. ...

So, it is not being claimed that Black lost because of 1...c5 ?

Black gets a usually practical disadvantage. It's hard to defend against the Alapin, in short.

kindaspongey

Jul 30, 2019

0

#949

dawson_632 wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

dawson_632

Jul 30, 2019

0

#950

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

this is the critical move i had in my notes, wouldve still done fine. im the 3rd in the tournament and 100% winrate with the alapin. gonna win me some bucks because i discovered this thread

kindaspongey

Jul 30, 2019

0

#951

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

this is the critical move i had in my notes, wouldve still done fine. im the 3rd in the tournament and 100% winrate with the alapin. gonna win me some bucks because i discovered this thread

So you have no reply to 5...d5 that you wish to share with us? By the way, does the choice of 2 Nf3 represent an absence of a belief in a forced win for White after 2 c3 ?

HolographWars

Jul 30, 2019

0

#952

I wish to bring up 6.e5

ChessBoy513

Jul 30, 2019

0

#953

dawson_632님이 썼습니다:

another sicilian player falls victim,

You won because black played weakly. I will play e6 after the pawn duo establishment to stop advances.(Scheveningen)

kindaspongey

Jul 30, 2019

0

#954

HolographWars wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

I wish to bring up 6.e5

And after 6...Nd7 ?

dawson_632

Jul 30, 2019

0

#955

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

this is the critical move i had in my notes, wouldve still done fine. im the 3rd in the tournament and 100% winrate with the alapin. gonna win me some bucks because i discovered this thread

So you have no reply to 5...d5 that you wish to share with us? By the way, does the choice of 2 Nf3 represent an absence of a belief in a forced win for White after 2 c3 ?

looking at a database isnt hard. my opponents dont have access to database or books in the middle of an otb game

kindaspongey

Jul 31, 2019

0

#956

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

this is the critical move i had in my notes, wouldve still done fine. im the 3rd in the tournament and 100% winrate with the alapin. gonna win me some bucks because i discovered this thread

So you have no reply to 5...d5 that you wish to share with us? By the way, does the choice of 2 Nf3 represent an absence of a belief in a forced win for White after 2 c3 ?

looking at a database isnt hard. my opponents dont have access to database or books in the middle of an otb game

If your confidence derives, in part, from your opponent's limited resources, doesn't that suggest an absence of a belief that you have a forced win for White after 1 e4 c5 ?

dawson_632

Jul 31, 2019

0

#957

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

this is the critical move i had in my notes, wouldve still done fine. im the 3rd in the tournament and 100% winrate with the alapin. gonna win me some bucks because i discovered this thread

So you have no reply to 5...d5 that you wish to share with us? By the way, does the choice of 2 Nf3 represent an absence of a belief in a forced win for White after 2 c3 ?

looking at a database isnt hard. my opponents dont have access to database or books in the middle of an otb game

If your confidence derives, in part, from your opponent's limited resources, doesn't that suggest an absence of a belief that you have a forced win for White after 1 e4 c5 ?

what? that's got nothing to do with my confidence. i never said its a forced win, i said i have 100% win rate percentage since i started playing it in the tournament. you are just arguing for the sake of arguing

kindaspongey

Jul 31, 2019

0

#958

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

kindaspongey wrote:

dawson_632 wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

this is the critical move i had in my notes, wouldve still done fine. im the 3rd in the tournament and 100% winrate with the alapin. gonna win me some bucks because i discovered this thread

So you have no reply to 5...d5 that you wish to share with us? By the way, does the choice of 2 Nf3 represent an absence of a belief in a forced win for White after 2 c3 ?

looking at a database isnt hard. my opponents dont have access to database or books in the middle of an otb game

If your confidence derives, in part, from your opponent's limited resources, doesn't that suggest an absence of a belief that you have a forced win for White after 1 e4 c5 ?

what? that's got nothing to do with my confidence. ...

Your confidence would be unchanged if, while playing, your opponent had access to a database and/or books?

kindaspongey

Jul 31, 2019

0

#959

dawson_632 wrote:

... i never said its a forced win, i said i have 100% win rate percentage since i started playing it in the tournament. you are just arguing for the sake of arguing

This thread was started to discuss the idea of a "bust to the Sicilian Defense".

("In my opinion the Sicilian Defense is busted. It loses by force." - staples13 (August 27, 2018))

Under the circumstances, isn't it only natural to try to determine whether or not you are trying to suggest the existence of a forced win for Black after 1 e4 c5 ?

dawson_632

Jul 31, 2019

0

#960