A Bust to the Sicilian Defense

Sort:
ChessieSystem101
HolographWars wrote:

It does not lose by force, but often times in otb club games White ends up with a big advantage.

May you show us perhaps 1000 games in which white won because that is how many you need to determine if the alapin in good at all.

kindaspongey
ChessBoy513 wrote:

… Refutation for black: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3. c3 Nf6 4.h3 Nxe4!=



HolographWars
ChessieSystem101 wrote:
HolographWars wrote:

It does not lose by force, but often times in otb club games White ends up with a big advantage.

May you show us perhaps 1000 games in which white won because that is how many you need to determine if the alapin in good at all.

I can try to put up as many games as possible, but I think Kasparov losing to the Alapin is good enough.

HolographWars
kindaspongey wrote:
HolographWars wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:
HolographWars wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:
dawson_632  wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

I wish to bring up 6.e5

And after 6...Nd7 ?

7. e6, a nice pawn sack to wreck Blavk’s development. It also weakens his kingside quite a bit.

And after 7...fxe6 ?

1. I need a board

ChessieSystem101
HolographWars wrote:
ChessieSystem101 wrote:
HolographWars wrote:

It does not lose by force, but often times in otb club games White ends up with a big advantage.

May you show us perhaps 1000 games in which white won because that is how many you need to determine if the alapin in good at all.

I can try to put up as many games as possible, but I think Kasparov losing to the Alapin is good enough.

Well, Kasparov lost to the Ruy Lopez before, so is IT the best openig in the world?

ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessieSystem101 wrote:
HolographWars wrote:

It does not lose by force, but often times in otb club games White ends up with a big advantage.

May you show us perhaps 1000 games in which white won because that is how many you need to determine if the alapin in good at all.

I can try to put up as many games as possible, but I think Kasparov losing to the Alapin is good enough.

With me crushing the Delayed Alapin nullifing the effect.

ChessieSystem101

but okay.

ChessieSystem101

HAS ANYONE EVEN CHECKED OUT STAPLES13 RECORD?

HolographWars

My games are nearly never decided by blunders, but they are often to decided by the openings. An opening that grants a big advantage more than 50 % of the time, a small advantage 25% and equality 25% sounds like a bust.

ChessieSystem101

I dont think so.

ChessBoy513
kindaspongey님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

… Refutation for black: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3. c3 Nf6 4.h3 Nxe4!=



OK I'll give a better situation for black.

That was how I beat the Delayed Alapin(Scheveningen Structure).

ChessieSystem101

Did most of yours or sstaples get an advantage i the opening? Post at least 500 games for that at least

ChessBoy513
ChessieSystem101님이 썼습니다:

HAS ANYONE EVEN CHECKED OUT STAPLES13 RECORD?

Yes but you should check my record.

HolographWars
ChessieSystem101 wrote:

Did most of yours or sstaples get an advantage i the opening? Post at least 500 games for that at least

Do you think I have that time? 

ChessBoy513
ChessieSystem101님이 썼습니다:

Did most of yours or sstaples get an advantage i the opening? Post at least 500 games for that at least

Uh... like seriously?

1)It's IMPOSSIBLE for me to show you 500 games because:

2)I only learned chess last October and didn't even hit 500 game mark:

3)and most of those games weren't even on chess.com.

ChessBoy513
kindaspongey님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

… Refutation for black: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3. c3 Nf6 4.h3 Nxe4!=



By the way, guess what's the result of a knight vs pawn endgame?

ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessieSystem101 wrote:

Did most of yours or sstaples get an advantage i the opening? Post at least 500 games for that at least

Do you think I have that time? 

@HolographWars you didn't even see my sample yet!!

Here's the site(for the last time!!): https://www.chess.com/live/game/3886195706

kindaspongey
HolographWars wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:
HolographWars wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:
HolographWars wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:
dawson_632  wrote:

… 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 c3 Nf6 4 h3 Nc6 5 Bd3 g6 … another sicilian player falls victim,

What about 5...d5 ?

I wish to bring up 6.e5

And after 6...Nd7 ?

7. e6, a nice pawn sack to wreck Blavk’s development. It also weakens his kingside quite a bit.

And after 7...fxe6 ?

1. I need a board



ChessieSystem101
ChessBoy513 wrote:
ChessieSystem101님이 썼습니다:

Did most of yours or sstaples get an advantage i the opening? Post at least 500 games for that at least

Uh... like seriously?

1)It's IMPOSSIBLE for me to show you 500 games because:

2)I only learned chess last October and didn't even hit 500 game mark:

3)and most of those games weren't even on chess.com.

i was talking to Holograph wars

ChessieSystem101
HolographWars wrote:
ChessieSystem101 wrote:

Did most of yours or sstaples get an advantage i the opening? Post at least 500 games for that at least

Do you think I have that time? 

Well how do we think that its a refutation?