You never encountered the Alapin. No wonder you have a huge success rate, you never play vs anti sicilians.
A Bust to the Sicilian Defense
Sort:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
You never encountered the Alapin. No wonder you have a huge success rate, you never play vs anti sicilians.
I have a record of 1 win, 0 draw and 0 loss against the DELAYED ALAPIN though.
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
You never encountered the Alapin. No wonder you have a huge success rate, you never play vs anti sicilians.
I have a record of 1 win, 0 draw and 0 loss against the DELAYED ALAPIN though.
Your sample size is quite small. 
SpiderUnicorn wrote:
Utter nonsense, as usual.
Why?
BeastBoy06 wrote:
HolographWars wrote:
BeastBoy06 wrote:
Staples13, the weirdest &$*# in the world
Proof?
Any concrete lines?
Or words?
I'm a 2300 and OOONNNNLLLYYY play the Sicilian
That ain’t a line. Just a line of words.
Besides, the Beastie Boys totally suck compared to Led Zeppelin.
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
You never encountered the Alapin. No wonder you have a huge success rate, you never play vs anti sicilians.
I have a record of 1 win, 0 draw and 0 loss against the DELAYED ALAPIN though.
Your sample size is quite small.
True.
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
BeastBoy06 wrote:
HolographWars wrote:
BeastBoy06 wrote:
Staples13, the weirdest &$*# in the world
Proof?
Any concrete lines?
Or words?
I'm a 2300 and OOONNNNLLLYYY play the Sicilian
That ain’t a line. Just a line of words.
I agree on your last two sentences.
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
You never encountered the Alapin. No wonder you have a huge success rate, you never play vs anti sicilians.
I have a record of 1 win, 0 draw and 0 loss against the DELAYED ALAPIN though.
Your sample size is quite small.
If you still want the sample, here's the site: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/3886195706
dawson_632 wrote:
1 e4 c5 2 c3 e5 … im on a winning streak otb with this variation. ,,,
"Both 2...Nf6 and 2...d5 are fine against the Alapin, and some players may also like 2...e6 or 2...g6." - IM pfren (September 4, 2018)
"Sorry for my long hiatus. I have returned!" - staples13 (April 19, 2019)
HolographWars wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:
HolographWars wrote … : ...
JustARandomPatzer wrote (April 20, 2019):
HolographWars wrote:
SpiderUnicorn wrote:
Well, i would play the Alapin any day if it gave me a 74% chance of a win!ma boy, the title to this pointless forum is already wrong, as you have already mentioned, you have lost 26% of your games with the Alapin, that proves that it is not a refutation to the Sicilian, m'boy
U-ummm.... Should I tell him that draws exist a well?
… A 74% success rate, I should say. (*cough cough*)
You count a draw as a "success" for White?
Against players 100+ rated higher than me, yes, as I frequently say play against them.
You feel that you have a way of knowing that, in the staples13 1 e4 c5 2 c3 draws, Black's rating was always 100+ rated higher?
kindaspongey wrote:
dawson_632 wrote:
1 e4 c5 2 c3 e5 … im on a winning streak otb with this variation. ,,,
"Both 2...Nf6 and 2...d5 are fine against the Alapin, and some players may also like 2...e6 or 2...g6." - IM pfren (September 4, 2018)
I remember a game I played against the Alapin and it wasn’t long before I lost.
kindaspongey wrote:
dawson_632 wrote:
1 e4 c5 2 c3 e5 … im on a winning streak otb with this variation. ,,,
"Both 2...Nf6 and 2...d5 are fine against the Alapin, and some players may also like 2...e6 or 2...g6." - IM pfren (September 4, 2018)
i dont think e5 was aa mistake anyways, i sacrificed a pawn for aggressive play
staples13 wrote (August 27, 2018):
... d5 and nf6 do provide much stiffer resistance than any of black's other responses. ...
kindaspongey wrote:
staples13 wrote (August 27, 2018):
... d5 and nf6 do provide much stiffer resistance than any of black's other responses. ...
again, he didnt lose from his second move. he didnt defend his f pawn thats why he lost. you cannot discredit my alapin game becaus he played e5
another sicilian player falls victim,
dawson_632 wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:
dawson_632 wrote:
1 e4 c5 2 c3 e5 … im on a winning streak otb with this variation. ,,,
"Both 2...Nf6 and 2...d5 are fine against the Alapin, and some players may also like 2...e6 or 2...g6." - IM pfren (September 4, 2018)
i dont think e5 was aa mistake ...
"?!" - GM Evgeny Sveshnikov (2010)
dawson_632 wrote:
… again, he didnt lose from his second move. … you cannot discredit my alapin game becaus he played e5
I made no claim about Black losing from the second move or the game being discredited.
People you're all crazy.
My winning rate WITH the SICILIAN is SO HIGH that I have better chances as black than white.
Play staples13 or me.
My last statement was true though.