A Bust to the Sicilian Defense

Sort:
congrandolor

You should write a book about the Alapin, as now you are a kind of celebrity.

kindaspongey

 

chuddog

84-page thread. Amazing. The Alapin is a perfectly fine line, but to claim the Sicilian is busted? I hope it's meant as a joke. 

LGM23

Threads shouldn't be 84 pages. It is hard to read them that way and most comments in this thread are complete sarcasm. I like searching Chess.com when I want to learn to play new opening. I get information from strong players that is useful, but this type of threads completely destroy the purpose of "Chess Openings" forum section. I ask Chess.com moderator to close this thread.

staples13
LGM23 wrote:

Threads shouldn't be 84 pages. It is hard to read them that way and most comments in this thread are complete sarcasm. I like searching Chess.com when I want to learn to play new opening. I get information from strong players that is useful, but this type of threads completely destroy the purpose of "Chess Openings" forum section. I ask Chess.com moderator to close this thread.

I must respectfully disagree with this statement. This thread has helped thousands learn how to beat the Sicilian with the Alapin. Just because you don’t find it particularly useful to your specific situation doesn’t mean the thread should be shut down. 

ericthatwho

Shut it down

Queeg500
staples13 wrote:
LGM23 wrote:

Threads shouldn't be 84 pages. It is hard to read them that way and most comments in this thread are complete sarcasm. I like searching Chess.com when I want to learn to play new opening. I get information from strong players that is useful, but this type of threads completely destroy the purpose of "Chess Openings" forum section. I ask Chess.com moderator to close this thread.

I must respectfully disagree with this statement. This thread has helped thousands learn how to beat the Sicilian with the Alapin. Just because you don’t find it particularly useful to your specific situation doesn’t mean the thread should be shut down. 

84 pages of dross. The only thing this thread has taught people is that the OP hasn't a clue what he/she is talking about.

SHUT IT DOWN!

staples13

The Sicilian only scores 30% against Staples13. That is abysmal. 

Queeg500
staples13 wrote:

The Sicilian only scores 30% against Staples13. That is abysmal. 

Shouldn't it be 0% if you say it's 'busted'?  This is just embarrassing and we're all losing the will to live. Give it up.

LGM23

Staples13, you aren't world chess champion to say that is abysmal. Your opponents also aren't grandmasters. You would probably score 5% or even less (that is a fact) if you just played against them. Sicilian Defense is played by top 10 chess players in the world and it has good reputation. There is no proof that Sicilian Defense is busted by Alapin. Your score against it means nothing, except your opponents are weak. And my problem isn't specific. It is hard to navigate through 84 pages even if content is good. Now I would ask chess.com moderator to MUTE you and stop you from making any threads while also closing this thread. That probably isn't possible, but you obviously deserve it. I won't answer anymore as I think I'm losing my brain cells now. 84 pages isn't a joke, or proof of your title. It just proves that you are a troll. END OF STORY

congrandolor

Woow, some people has a thin skin here

Sunny_Jimbo
LGM23 wrote:

Staples13, you aren't world chess champion to say that is abysmal. Your opponents also aren't grandmasters. You would probably score 5% or even less (that is a fact) if you just played against them. Sicilian Defense is played by top 10 chess players in the world and it has good reputation. There is no proof that Sicilian Defense is busted by Alapin. Your score against it means nothing, except your opponents are weak. And my problem isn't specific. It is hard to navigate through 84 pages even if content is good. Now I would ask chess.com moderator to MUTE you and stop you from making any threads while also closing this thread. That probably isn't possible, but you obviously deserve it. I won't answer anymore as I think I'm losing my brain cells now. 84 pages isn't a joke, or proof of your title. It just proves that you are a troll. END OF STORY

Just because someone isn't accustomed to the massive theory involving the Sicilian defense, it doesn't give you the right to be straight up mean about it. This stuff is really just clickbait. Chill. Taking away someone's right to speak just because of an opinion is just low. This man is just proud of himself for his accomplishment.

ericthatwho

What accomplishment?

The wet paper bag test?

LGM23

Thanks for support Sunny_Jimbo. resign.pngthumbup.png

 

MorphysMayhem

The OP lost all credibility by proposing the Sicilian to be busted. C'mon people!

MentalWarZone
I like the opening idea
staples13


I destroyed another NM just now with the Alapin. I am now 2-0 against titled players using the Alapin who dare to play the Sicilian against me over the past week or so. This is a 2275 rated FIDE player, so no one can claim he is weak. Even an extremely strong player like him could not survive 14 moves against the Alapin. I’m only presenting the facts,  Interpret them as you may. 

kindaspongey
"... 1. e4 c5 2. c3 d5 3. exd5 Qxd5 4. d4 cxd4 5. cxd4 Nf6 ... 1-0 …" - staples13 (~1 hour ago)
kindaspongey wrote (~24 days ago):
staples13 wrote (August 29, 2018):

… Here's another 3 minute no increment blitz game showing black cracking under the constant pressure from white's pieces. … 1.e4 c5 2.c3 d5 3.exd5 Qxd5 4.d4 cxd4?! { Inaccurate becuase it gives white too much play } 5.cxd4 Nc6 6.Nf3 Bg4 … Clearly black can not take on d4. ...

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=3

"... White is winning after 1. e4 c5 2. c3 d5 3. exd5 Qxd5 4. d4 cxd4 5.cxd4 Nc6. ..." - staples13 (October 24, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=26

"Yes in that line 6. Nf3 is still winning" - staples13 (October 24, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=26

"In [1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.c3 d5 4.exd5 Qxd5 5.d4 cxd4 6.cxd4 e5 7.Nc3 Bb4 8.Bd2 Bxc3 9.Bxc3 e4 10.Ne5 Nxe5 11.dxe5 Ne7] ... Qe2 would've maintained the winning advantage" - staples13 (October 24, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=26

"[After 1.e4 c5 2.c3 d5 3.exd5 Qxd5 4.d4 Nc6 5.Nf3 cxd4 6.cxd4 e5 7.Nc3 Bb4 8.Bd2 Bxc3 9.Bxc3 e4 10.Ne5 Nxe5 11.dxe5 Ne7 12.Qe2 O-O 13.Rd1 Qc6,] 14.Rd6! { this was the move white missed. } 14...Qc7 15.Qxe4 Bf5 16.Qd4 Nc6 17.Qc5 Rac8 18.Bb5 { white is up a pawn and his position is clear;y far superior }" - staples13 (November 8, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=33

"Why would black play 14...Qc7? What if 14...Qa4 ...?" - littlesoldier123 (November 8, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=33

… Are we going to see staples13 identify a winning improvement for White?

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=75

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

staples13

Titled players score 0% using the Sicilian against Staples13

kindaspongey
staples13 wrote (August 31, 2019):

… I only play blitz and bullet ...

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=69

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^