that its notnig special gm take on c6 knowing of Qf6 kasparov used to do it as white a lot usally he played Qd two here
Any way to get around this repotire
Sort:
Chris1a1c1 wrote:
Check out post #80. Says the same thing with lot less flair.
You said 5...Qf6 with out white to move. Which makes your post with less flair and incorrect.
Chris1a1c1 wrote:
I'm in the 4 .. Bc5 camp, with the follow up 5 .. Qf6. It works out pretty well for me at my club and in tournaments U1800.
5...Qf6 would drop a piece in some variations.
Black can play 5...Qf6
against 5.Nxc6
against 5.Be3
However, Black can not play 5...Qf6 against 5.Nb3.
Which is another popular variation used by white at move 5.
X_PLAYER_J_X wrote:
5...Qf6 would drop a piece in some variations.
Black can play 5...Qf6
against 5.Nxc6
against 5.Be3
However, Black can not play 5...Qf6 against 5.Nb3.
Which is another popular variation used by white at move 5.
Yes I would agree that 5. Nb3 should not be met by Qf6. Although I've had this played against me 10's of times in slow OTB games. In those cases I've only had 5. Nxc6, Be3 and once c3 played against me. To which I respond Qf6.
If white would ever have played 5. Nb3 I would not have had a prepared responce. I'm guessing I would respond 5 .. Bb6. Maybe I should update my repertoire, thank you.
Jul 1, 2015
0
#85
5Nb3 is nowdays arguably the best response to Bc5, at least leading to fresher positions. Carlsen has used it in one or two games.
sorry it wasnt intendid to be a puzz just click find the solution
and i dont like 5nb3 whats the point of moving the knight from a central sqare
Jul 1, 2015
0
#89
After 5...Bc5 6Nb3 Bb6 the idea is to play Qe2, followed by be3 and castle queenside. I am actually not sure what the drawback to 5...Qf6 is, if there is one.
what is the idea idea of nb3 not the plan of the opening
Check out post #80. Says the same thing with lot less flair.