Anybody play 3.Nc6 against the classical French?

Sort:
lemonchesspie

 
I tried out this Nc6 line because I kept getting the Burn variation (3.Nf6 4.Bg5) and losing against it.  Anybody have insights with this line?
 
I've actually played 3 games with it so far, and twice my opponents blundered in the opening (~1750), this must not get played too often.  They both went into this line: 
I definitely didn't choose this line for this trap, but it definitely seems to throw people off.  Thoughts, anyone?

boun68

well.. the whole point of the French is to attack the center with the c5 break. after 4. e5, your position is simply cramped and you will have to move your c6 knight again very soon. if you are that afraid of 4. bg5 in the classical, you could go instead with a bishop move: 3... Bb4 (winauer) Be7.

kingsrook11

This variation gets a whole chapter in Watson's excellent Dangerous Weapons in the French Defence. As for 5f4 that seems a poor move to me and I am several hundred points below 1750 at blitz.

TitanCG

I guess after 5.Bb5 the game depends on whether White can do something with the e5 square. You seem to be trading tactical problems for positional ones by playing ...Nc6 instead of allowing the Burn.

lemonchesspie
repac3161 wrote:

This variation gets a whole chapter in Watson's excellent Dangerous Weapons in the French Defence. As for 5f4 that seems a poor move to me and I am several hundred points below 1750 at blitz.

Ah, didn't know it was covered in there, thanks for the tip!  Yeah, it seems like people get thrown off and just try and play it like an advanced french, where f4 is often played with hope of play along the f-file.  but obviously that doesnt work here.