AZPawnstar wrote:
Apparently better than you.
Still not addressing the point. Lame how your comebacks are just childish insults and not actual thinking, like what you don’t do.
anyone know a tactical and attacking opening against the english
Sort:
Jul 28, 2024
0
#43
AZPawnstar wrote:
OK. I'll use smaller words...does his comment include the word 'if?'
Huh? Still not addressing my point? Lol
Jul 28, 2024
0
#44
AZPawnstar wrote:
jesus dude, its not that hard. read the IF in his comment!
Dude just get to the point, don’t be stupid.
Jul 28, 2024
0
#45
AZPawnstar wrote:
"IF white decides to take less space!!!!" That is something you cant control.
If white decides to take more space, it would lead to a regular KID. Please, at least look at the context 🤦
Jul 28, 2024
0
#46
AZPawnstar wrote:
the point wis obvious to those of us who arent total morons.
If I’m a moron, you’re a “‘tard”, as you call it.
Jul 28, 2024
0
#47
AZPawnstar wrote:
nope. white simply plays the botvinnick. game over.
It’s equal. Do your research, please.
Jul 28, 2024
0
#48
The botvinnick isn’t a refutation, it’s just an aggressive variation that leads to a fun game, however both sides need to know what they’re doing.
Jul 28, 2024
0
#49
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
nope. white simply plays the botvinnick. game over.
It’s equal. Do your research, please.
ok. how about we play a game. i'll play white and open with the english, you play kid. i will use the botnivick variation so you will know exactly what i plan to do. we will see how 'equal' those are.
I dont play KID, stupid. Also, it will be unfair since you are 800 elo points higher. Maybe actually think?
Jul 28, 2024
0
#50
AZPawnstar wrote:
You sure give a lot of technical advice for someone with a low elo.
Just because I’m “low elo” doesn’t mean I’m stupid. I do a lot of research, and, though I can’t really replicate it, I still know about it. Anyway, still not addressing the point.
Jul 28, 2024
0
#51
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
You sure give a lot of technical advice for someone with a low elo.
Just because I’m “low elo” doesn’t mean I’m stupid. I do a lot of research, and, though I can’t really replicate it, I still know about it. Anyway, still not addressing the point.
its true that just because you have a low elo doesnt mean youre stupid. it also doesnt mean you arent stupid. generally speaking, people with low elos no less about chess theory. you are proving this point with nearly every one of your posts.
Again, assuming stuff about me lol. I know about the botvinnick, though i don’t play it. Please, shut up and respond to my POINT.
Jul 28, 2024
0
#52
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
You sure give a lot of technical advice for someone with a low elo.
Just because I’m “low elo” doesn’t mean I’m stupid. I do a lot of research, and, though I can’t really replicate it, I still know about it. Anyway, still not addressing the point.
its true that just because you have a low elo doesnt mean youre stupid. it also doesnt mean you arent stupid. generally speaking, people with low elos no less about chess theory. you are proving this point with nearly every one of your posts.
Again, assuming stuff about me lol. I know about the botvinnick, though i don’t play it. Please, shut up and respond to my POINT.
You have a new point now? what is your new point?
No, my ORIGINAL POINT. He was HELPING YOU.
Jul 28, 2024
0
#53
AZPawnstar wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
You sure give a lot of technical advice for someone with a low elo.
Just because I’m “low elo” doesn’t mean I’m stupid. I do a lot of research, and, though I can’t really replicate it, I still know about it. Anyway, still not addressing the point.
its true that just because you have a low elo doesnt mean youre stupid. it also doesnt mean you arent stupid. generally speaking, people with low elos no less about chess theory. you are proving this point with nearly every one of your posts.
Again, assuming stuff about me lol. I know about the botvinnick, though i don’t play it. Please, shut up and respond to my POINT.
You have a new point now? what is your new point?
and out of curiosily, what do you think i am assmuming about you in my previous post?
Assuming I don’t know theory, isn’t it obvious?
Jul 28, 2024
0
#55
AZPawnstar wrote:
You sure give a lot of technical advice for someone with a low elo.
Funny that someone with a low elo can outthink you so easily and make you into a buffoon in public, isn't it?
Jul 28, 2024
0
#57
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
You sure give a lot of technical advice for someone with a low elo.
Just because I’m “low elo” doesn’t mean I’m stupid. I do a lot of research, and, though I can’t really replicate it, I still know about it. Anyway, still not addressing the point.
its true that just because you have a low elo doesnt mean youre stupid. it also doesnt mean you arent stupid. generally speaking, people with low elos no less about chess theory. you are proving this point with nearly every one of your posts.
Again, assuming stuff about me lol. I know about the botvinnick, though i don’t play it. Please, shut up and respond to my POINT.
You have a new point now? what is your new point?
No, my ORIGINAL POINT. He was HELPING YOU.
ive already addressed that point.
How, exactly?
Jul 28, 2024
0
#58
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
You sure give a lot of technical advice for someone with a low elo.
Just because I’m “low elo” doesn’t mean I’m stupid. I do a lot of research, and, though I can’t really replicate it, I still know about it. Anyway, still not addressing the point.
its true that just because you have a low elo doesnt mean youre stupid. it also doesnt mean you arent stupid. generally speaking, people with low elos no less about chess theory. you are proving this point with nearly every one of your posts.
Again, assuming stuff about me lol. I know about the botvinnick, though i don’t play it. Please, shut up and respond to my POINT.
You have a new point now? what is your new point?
and out of curiosily, what do you think i am assmuming about you in my previous post?
Assuming I don’t know theory, isn’t it obvious?
yes, it is pretty obvious that you dont know theory, if that is what you are saying.
Proof: tRUst mE BrO
Jul 28, 2024
0
#60
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
TumoKonnin wrote:
AZPawnstar wrote:
You sure give a lot of technical advice for someone with a low elo.
Just because I’m “low elo” doesn’t mean I’m stupid. I do a lot of research, and, though I can’t really replicate it, I still know about it. Anyway, still not addressing the point.
its true that just because you have a low elo doesnt mean youre stupid. it also doesnt mean you arent stupid. generally speaking, people with low elos no less about chess theory. you are proving this point with nearly every one of your posts.
Again, assuming stuff about me lol. I know about the botvinnick, though i don’t play it. Please, shut up and respond to my POINT.
You have a new point now? what is your new point?
and out of curiosily, what do you think i am assmuming about you in my previous post?
Assuming I don’t know theory, isn’t it obvious?
yes, it is pretty obvious that you dont know theory, if that is what you are saying.
Proof: tRUst mE BrO
sure, dude. i trust some random guy on the internet.
That was a meme…
ok. how did his post help me?
He explained why one might play the KID against the english. Can you read?