Come up with a (serious) gambit!

the anti-gambit: start with grob opening then do pawn to f3. finishes all games so quickly. would(n't) recommend.


This is a "Gambit" I played once in over-the-board chess against the Botvinnik-Carls Variation of the Caro-kann because I was mixing up theory, which caused me to look into if it's really that bad afterward. Normally, white will get the pawn back, or more if black falls for a trap in this line.
Now I play this in over-the-board chess on purpose, because I've come to the conclusion that it's perfectly fine and sound, and it gets my opponents out of theory.

French Defense: Scholar's Gambit
it gives black a huge lead in development, while the material advantage is the same. the bishop on h6 might be preventing black from castling, and the white queen might be very dangerous, but overall it gives black a huge advantage.

I actually played THIS exact line once, when I used to play stonewall attack and wanted to kick an that surprisingly aggressive off its outpost square. NORMALLY, I always just played Nf3 automatically, but after i saw the queen's check and the familiar rook grab plans, i stopped and though a minute or even 2 before springing the queen's dungeon trap
Then it was just a matter of time maybe blocking a bishop check with c3, moving my queen to e2, bishop to d2, castling, playing Be1 to protect the rook and springing Bg2 offering black a choice of minor pieces to take.
i guess this is the "horowitz defense", so maybe I'll call it the "horror for the witch" gambit. only 5 other players in the database have found the trap. OK... playing ...e5 is how black creates his escape. fortunately my opponent didn't figure it out
The orangutan gambit
I thought that was already a thing