Shepi, what is the line?
Defences to the Parham Attack
Sort:
The_Gavinator wrote:
Shepi, what is the line?
See the variation, leading to at least a slightly better ending, when white's attack has dissapated.
Dog was doing great, he just messed up, he shoulda taken c4 instead of f6.
That's the variation that leads to a slightly better ending that I want you to refute. I doubt you can.
The_Gavinator wrote:
Dog was doing great, he just messed up, he shoulda taken c4 instead of f6.
I'm wondering if this guy can admit he did something wrong...
No, he was obviously sacking because he calculated that eventually he could take h5 with check, when his attack is "overwhelming"
shepi13 wrote:
That's the variation that leads to a slightly better ending that I want you to refute. I doubt you can.
What that tells me is that you know you were lost, and I don't need to waste my time on you, since all that matters is that the Parham is great.
The_Gavinator wrote:
shepi13 wrote:
That's the variation that leads to a slightly better ending that I want you to refute. I doubt you can.
What that tells me is that you know you were lost, and I don't need to waste my time on you, since all that matters is that the Parham is great.
Thanks, Gavinator, I needed that laugh!
Why, because shepi is dumb?
The_Gavinator wrote:
shepi13 wrote:
That's the variation that leads to a slightly better ending that I want you to refute. I doubt you can.
What that tells me is that you know you were lost, and I don't need to waste my time on you, since all that matters is that the Parham is great.
And can you tell me what is wrong with my line, or, even better, refute the same line except with Be6 instead of c6.
You're offering me a challenge because it can be solved, and I don't need to waste my time. You know you were done, you just won't admit it.
The_Gavinator wrote:
You're offering me a challenge because it can be solved, and I don't need to waste my time. You know you were done, you just won't admit it.
If it can be solved, solve it. Figure out what my in my line is bad, or I will announce to the world that I have refuted the parham! I will even break the rules and make my own thread! (RULE NUMBER 1: NO MORE PARHAM THREADS) (RULE NUMBER 2: NO MORE PARHAM).
I enjoy seeing the other lines, it helps me beat people faster.
Why are you such a troll?
I'll challenge you to an online game in it then. I've already beaten whatupyodog, quite badly too, and gavinator cannot refute my lines so he resorts to calling me a troll. I would strongly recommend that if you want to contend with high rated players you at least play an opening that offers you equality.
Well, you suck i was destroying you until i hung piece, after that i just got careless and didnt really try.
Refute the line I gave then whatupyodog. At worst that's a draw for me, and it's a possible win, so without a refutation then either:
A) We have refuted the parham!
or B) The parham is drawish.
Depending on if stronger players than me would evaluate that ending as a win or as a draw.