Finding a way against 1.d4

Sort:
Avatar of Optimissed
CelticLiberal wrote:
Queens Gambit Declined... easy to learn...simple...solid...tough to beat>>

I like playing against it ... it's positionally difficult for black. First things first ... play a more tactical opening like the QGA first. Then move on to positional openings.

Avatar of JohnPointer
Optimissed wrote: CelticLiberal wrote: Queens Gambit Declined... easy to learn...simple...solid...tough to beat>> I like playing against it ... it's positionally difficult for black. First things first ... play a more tactical opening like the QGA first. Then move on to positional openings. There is nothing wrong with the QGA. Great opening as well. As black, though, I prefer to respond to 1. d4 with 1. ... Nf6 2. c4 e6 and then go Nimzo-Indian if 3. Nc3 and go QGD if 3. Nf3 with 3. ... d5
Avatar of Optimissed

Why do you prefer playing a Nimzo and avoid a Queen's Indian? Personally, as white, I'll play against a Nimzo happily and yet I prefer to avoid the Queen's Indian.

Avatar of Alejandro88

Benoni and Budapest defense (Benoni is better)

Avatar of Optimissed

Budapest is awful.

Avatar of ThrillerFan
Optimissed wrote:

Why do you prefer playing a Nimzo and avoid a Queen's Indian? Personally, as white, I'll play against a Nimzo happily and yet I prefer to avoid the Queen's Indian.

Why do you have to like the QID if you play the NID?

Many play the NID because they are really Benoni players but avoid playing it straight up because of the Taimanov Variation (a.k.a. The Flick-Knife Attack), and so they will play 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 and if 3.Nc3, play a Nimzo, while if 3.Nf3 or 3.g3 (attempting to play a Catalan), they will replay 3...c5.

Others may simply go QGD only when White plays 3.Nf3 to avoid the Exchange lines with Nge2, and play Nimzo against 3.Nc3.

So there are reasons to play the Nimzo and not the QID.

I'm playing the Grunfeld right now, so none of this applies to me.

Avatar of TerryMills

I have found the book "How to beat 1d4" by James Rizzitano helpful and readable; it is based on QGA. Readers of this column will know that, in QGA, Black should not try to hang on to the pawn advantage - but there is a nice video on this at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ue14nMxaO4

 

Avatar of Optimissed
ThrillerFan wrote:
Optimissed wrote:

Why do you prefer playing a Nimzo and avoid a Queen's Indian? Personally, as white, I'll play against a Nimzo happily and yet I prefer to avoid the Queen's Indian.

Why do you have to like the QID if you play the NID?

Many play the NID because they are really Benoni players but avoid playing it straight up because of the Taimanov Variation (a.k.a. The Flick-Knife Attack), and so they will play 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 and if 3.Nc3, play a Nimzo, while if 3.Nf3 or 3.g3 (attempting to play a Catalan), they will replay 3...c5.

Others may simply go QGD only when White plays 3.Nf3 to avoid the Exchange lines with Nge2, and play Nimzo against 3.Nc3.

So there are reasons to play the Nimzo and not the QID.

I'm playing the Grunfeld right now, so none of this applies to me.

OK I quite like playing against the Taimanov. I tend to dislike the Grunfeld but will play the Russian or, sometimes, 4 Bf4 for a change, if I'm feeling adventurous, since that seems to be very difficult. I agree that many people think the way you suggest but, since g3 is strong against the Modern Benoni, it isn't all that logical to do so. I'd rather play the MB against the Taimanov than against g3, as a matter of fact.

Avatar of ipcress12

The Dutch is a decent, though somewhat eccentric, defense to 1.d4.

With the early f5 it's probably not as sound as the QGD and few GMs play the Dutch, but at the class level it often leads to dynamic, imbalanced positions with lots of play -- if you like that sort of thing.

The Dutch also comes in three distinct flavors: Stonewall, Classical, and Leningrad, which allows Black to keep White guessing.

Since the Dutch is not played a lot even at the class level, you will usually be more knowledgeable than your White opponents.

In any event there is not a huge amount of Dutch theory compared to other major QP defenses. Plus it crosses up alternative White QP openings like the London, Tromp, Colle etc.

Avatar of lolurspammed

The QID isn't as dynamic as the NID. My most boring games have been QID games.

Avatar of 5thwheel
GodIike schreef:
fatymid wrote:

I play d4 myself and from that perspective I find Tarrash and Nimzowitsch the most interesting. However, I do not know if Tarrash is playable nowadays.

The tarrasch is infact quite good, and has some very good literature dedicated to it.

As for 'nimzowitsch', do you mean the nimzo indian? or perhaps the chigorn (1.d4 d5 2.c4 Nc6) which you may have confused with the nimzowitsch defence against e4 (1.e4 nc6 2.d4 d5)?

Of course nimzowitsch was such an opening pioneer there are probably 10 lines against d4, if not more, named after him.

Male emantipation is a building with lots of tools pipes ventilators make an exo skeleton to with stand the force of nature

that was my first fought after playing sevral openings