invinted... opining and trap... named... me... famous

  • #21
    Bicarbonatofsoda wrote:

    wonder will Adam really get this ?

    I get very much.

  • #22
    Bicarbonatofsoda wrote:

    hehehe lolcopter

    lollerskates

  • #23

    loltroll

  • #24

    i hope this gets 2000 rpelies

  • #25

    Funny side note: Daeth blocked me from posting in his thread after I exposed his Houdini-perfect middlegame play against that master.

  • #26
    FirebrandX wrote:

    Funny side note: Daeth blocked me from posting in his thread after I exposed his Houdini-perfect middlegame play against that master.

    In the roughly two years I have been on the site, a fair number of "engine users" have vigorously stirred up the forums in the manner you describe above.

    They also seem to deliberately pick fights with NMs in the forums, (all the while) comparing their engine evaluations against suggestions by the NMs.

    Seems like just another version of -- I'm the Big Man on Campus Syndrome.

  • #27
    pellik wrote:

    Maybe it would work better if you say 'check' upon Qh4.

    THANKS FOR THE ADVISE!

  • #28

    I will name my opining in remembirance of Daeth.

  • #29
    ponz111 wrote:
    you must write a scientific paper on the opening and put it  up for peer review.

    Yes, I am talking to my scientist friend about the best way to run the necessary mathematical models. I have been having a bit of trouble with the k-variable, but x and y are working fine, and z is clearly correlated properly with both the a and b coefficients. Do you think I will need to use delta-sigma factorization, or should I just stick with a simple colinear regression?

  • #30

    delta-sigma factorization is a must for the type of scientific paper you will write. 

    Also, you are NOT allowed to use a calculator as that would be cheating!

or Join

Online Now