No
MacCutcheon refutation of 4.Bg5?
Having a small advantage of 0.2-1.4 as Black doesn't mean that you've refuted the opening White played. Plus, engines are known for not being very useful in the early stages in the opening.
well if an opening leads to even a small edge for Black, White failed in the opening, as White should aim for an advantage.
and I'm referring to lines that are considered 'main lines'
for example:
€: I think the claim 4.Bg5 is refuted by the MacCutcheon can be backed up by the fact that most of the recent french defense repetoire books, made the MacCutcheon on of their main recommendation:
Aagard - playing the french / vitiguov - the french defense reloaded / Antic - The Modern French

I do find that variation the hardest to play against as white out of all the French lines to be fair.
I found myself a way around the MacCutcheon, as I have been playing 4.Bg5 against the Classical French so far and picking up 4.e5 as new move is simply too much to study at the moment.
My approach is simply to play. after 4... Bb4, 5.e5 h6, 6.Be3 Ne4 and now 7.Ne2. not that this promises any advantage, but as I play Ne2 against the Winawar so I can get structures that I am familiar with.

Engines have no clue what's going on in positions with a fixed center structure (King's Indian Defence, French etc). Proper evaluation needs long-term planning, and engines cannot do that.
Here is a correspondence game. With the aid of his engine, Black met a very strong correspondence Grandmaster- after 11...c4 engines evaluate the position as something alike -0.50 or so. Well, the rest of the game is quite painful to watch, let alone play...
The truth is that after 11...c4 Black is technically lost: he lacks any serious counterplay, and he is doomed watching white slaughtering him on the kingside.
Black has to do something before it's too late. See here how Viktor the Terrible evacuated his king from the danger zone as soon as possible (14...Ke7) and succeeded. Engines disapprove, and claim his opponent had a large, probably decisive advantage at a couple of points. They are right, but it hardly matters: Chess is about what people understand, and play OTB, not what engines calculate.
while this is a nice game. Black misplayed the position. a dangerous plan after 11...c4, 12.Be2 is 12... Qb6 with the idea of playing Qb2 and winning the a pawn. and that slow assault on Blacks king is best defended by evacuating the king to the queenside. not keeping it on the kingside.

while this is a nice game. Black misplayed the position. a dangerous plan after 11...c4, 12.Be2 is 12... Qb6 with the idea of playing Qb2 and winning the a pawn. and that slow assault on Blacks king is best defended by evacuating the king to the queenside. not keeping it on the kingside.
I'm afraid I don't get it. ...Qb2 is threatening nothing, white can simply move the knight from g1 whenever the Black Queen goes there.
It might have more point if Black waits for Rh1-h3 before placing the Queen at b6, but still winning the a-pawn and being mated on the other side of the board is not a terribly appetizing plan.
waiting for the rook to leave the first rank makes sense Nc6 is on the agenda anyways. and no way in hell black will get mated, if he defends accurately or simply leaves the danger zone moving the king to the queen side. if white really just gave away its a-pawn, then blacks a pawn will simply move ahead to promote. with all whites pieces stuck on the kingside shooting blanks thats going to be pretty easy.

Based on engine analysis, I'd go a step further. White has no advantage after 3 Nc3 according to the engine analysis I've seen. The only move that gives white any kind of an edge is 3 Nd2. How seriously one should take the engine analysis in the typically closed positions that arise is another matter, and not one I care to speculate on. But after 3 Nc3 Nf6 it's nothing but triple zeroes as far as Stockfish is concerned. Then after 4 Bg5 it goes for the MacCutcheon.
while this is a nice game. Black misplayed the position. a dangerous plan after 11...c4, 12.Be2 is 12... Qb6 with the idea of playing Qb2 and winning the a pawn. and that slow assault on Blacks king is best defended by evacuating the king to the queenside. not keeping it on the kingside.
Even if black could teleport the queen to b2 in one move how is that winning the a pawn?

Based on engine analysis, I'd go a step further. White has no advantage after 3 Nc3 according to the engine analysis I've seen. The only move that gives white any kind of an edge is 3 Nd2. How seriously one should take the engine analysis in the typically closed positions that arise is another matter, and not one I care to speculate on. But after 3 Nc3 Nf6 it's nothing but triple zeroes as far as Stockfish is concerned. Then after 4 Bg5 it goes for the MacCutcheon.
Here's a "secret" from someone who plays the French Tarrasch with White: Black can equalize in a few different ways after 3...c5.

"The only move that gives white any kind of an edge is 3 Nd2."
Oh my... ignorance is bliss.
Talking about the McCutcheon, feel free to find how white is winning in the following game. I am pretty sure that there is a win somewhere after 17.Bxh6 (of course the stupid engine will claim some advantage to Black), but the position is so complex that I could not find a way, and (needless to say) engines suggest nonsense in such positions with closed center. In any case, it is a very interesting game, but somehow I was annoyed for just drawing this...
Is the MacCutcheon a 'refutation' for 4.Bg5 in the Classical French? I have done some engine analysis and it seems that all White can get is draws by perpetual check, and if White doesn't go for those. Stockfish/Komodo 10 consider Blacks position already slightly better by 0.20 to 0.40.
Is this be the reason that 4.Bg5 is no longer seen against the classical French in top level chess?