So then d4 is the strongest opening move



Modern programs are more powerful than what Deep Blue was, and it does not matter in any case as the best computers use human made opening books, the engine kicks in when the opening book is over. So the engine only use the openings that the human told it to use.

I hate to knock you off your cloud, but making a computer think for half an hour will not find the best opening move.
To have a definitive answer as to what is the best opening move, you would have to solve chess. This would take a computer a billion times more powerful than your computer a billion-times-a-billion years (or something ridiculous like that).

Deep Blue played e4, and it caused GM Joel Benjamin, who helped with the programming, to switch to e4 openings.
A fairly strong player I know descibed openings to me this way:
When you play e4 and get an advantage, it's a so-so advantage. BUT, when you play d4 and get an advantage, it is usually a BIG advantage. Of course, this was his opinion.


Wow, this is crazy, I was looking on the web informations about the origin of the boogey man, and then I click chess.com link, come to this thread, the first thing I read is this. That's scarier than the boogey man...

The idea that e4 must be the strongest move because why else would it be the favorite of Grand Masters is an Aristotelian argument: A simple appeal to authority rather than to the merits of the discussion.
Personally I like d4 openings. They are wild, brassy, in-your-face... all traits which I avoid in my daily life as a respectable person in a small, New England town.


The idea that e4 must be the strongest move because why else would it be the favorite of Grand Masters is an Aristotelian argument: A simple appeal to authority rather than to the merits of the discussion.
An appeal to authority is not an "aristotelian argument" it's a sophism. And in that case it wouldn't be an appeal to authority either, it would be called an endoxa and a perfectly valid argument.


