Isn't there someone who knows this line? *bump*
The f3 Benko Gambit (Half-Accepted)
f3 line is interesting and black should avoid playing like this :
Breaking white's centre with e6 is a correct idea, but u have to be ready in this line.
Maybe black could improve on this game, but really difficult...
So what is your choice?
U can play solid this way :
Black queen will be attacked with Nc4 but not a problem. Black usually retreats with Qd8 and reacts with e6. This line is advocated by Aveskulov in his excellent repertoire book "attack with black".
A sample line :
Black can once again reacts with d5, or regroup with Nd7-Bf6.
Another idea is to play e6 in a different way, like in this game :
Personnally i like this variation, very active and intuitive.
And a last one, which seems specualtive but can be fun :
2 pawns down but not easy for white to castle...
So u have choice : depends on your taste and how u want to play.
I prefer the line played by Robson, but Aveskulov's line is safe and easy to remember.
The c4 gambit is insane, i don't know if it is sound (probably not) but many GM play it and has practical value.
I love playing the Benko, but there are a couple of variations that confuse me and this f3 line is one of them. Any insights?
I did a study on the main line of it so far to try and get some ideas. From what I can tell white gets a very imposing pawn chain by preparing e4 with f3 and black MUST break it down by playing e6. Is this correct?
I made a video on my findings so far, which are useful, but it would be helpful to know if I'm missing any basic ideas in this line.
https://www.chess.com/blog/MidnasLament/an-intro-the-f3-benko-gambit
I don't want to be crushed by this line anymore. Thanks in advance!
-Stacia