The Fried Liver Attack is OP

See the video I posted above. its no blunder. It works totally.

the traxler counterattack works if your opponent doesn't know how to beat it

A way to refute the fried liver:

Bake it instead of frying it

LMAO LOL

Not at all- by a long shot.

You are coming to conclusions without knowing what you're talking about.

But it was wrongly named. It should be called the Trashler.

Trillions of chess games had been played in the history of chess. 

There is no single game in chess history where one side won without blunders from opponent. 

Past your pgn here and I can check blunder with Stockfish . 

no

7.Nxf7?? Massive blunder.  Lost material 4.6

Took me 2 seconds to find out. Lol. 

I don't play tracker that much I play it once in a while

Traxler

u could refute the fried liver by playing the english defense

or u could play the relatively unknown sideline of the english defense

you could play this

thts the bongcloud theoretical variation and i dont bother too much with theory.

you could try to get away from theory with this

ok

The bad move is actually the greedy 6.d6? (6.c3! should be played, when with best play white emerges a pawn up for dubious compensation), and you don't need an engine to evaluate this: Hundreds of games played.

6.Kf1 is just an equal game, and 5.Nxf7? a bad move.

White gets a big advantage with either 5.Bxf7+, or 5.d4!

Needless to say, almost all of the "analysis" featured here in various posts is crap. The wheel has been invented, and there is no need to reinvent it, especially if you have no idea about the art of analysis.