Which one is better, queen's gambit accepted or denied?

As the title says.

I tend to think that denied is easier for begginer.

What do you think?

The Queen's Gambit Declined would have far more opening theory to know as compared to the Queen's Gambit Accepted. If you are just starting out, I'd suggest the Queen's Gambit Accepted but don't try to hold on to the extra pawn.

Thanks.

I will change to the accepted.

All depends on what your comfortable with... I've played both..

The QGA is sharp from the jump off, exspecially when White takes the center with e4. Myself, im more comfortable with a pawn in the center, hence I think I play the denied better.

thoery wise ... The denied is more than the accepted, both are solid.

My advise with anyone who is new to the QGD ... study the Carlsbad pawn formation. There is plenty of material in print, and knowledge of it will yeld positives in your play.

I dont know, sorry.

Queens Gambit is my standard opening with white, and I'm not particular about either option.

I don't know which is "better"; I play and prefer the QGA as black.

Thanks, I will search this formation

QGD has more theory, but you aren't punished if you dont know it.

QGA has less theory, but if you don't know it, you can get rolled very quickly.

example game:

I didn't know how to play either the Queen's Indian, nor the QGD (which it later transposed into), but as long as you play reasonably you can get a good game.

I dont think there is a clear answer to that, depends on your playing style and your knowledge on the game

Here is a game to demonstrate what could happen if you aren't aware of the theory in the QGA: