Bulldog with Witch - captaintugwash vs rychessmaster1 (unrated - 1. f4 g5)

I mean, if there's any doubt about my intention, it's different and I'd take it on the chin. You see the slack I cut people, rated or not. It would be disappointing to be forced into playing an obvious typo, especially unrated.

Thanks.

It's your move.

I will try to double check my posts to avoid this being a problem.

Are you going for four pawns vs witch and knight? Spicy.

*corrected typo

16. d4 Bxe2 17. Bxe2

This is much more exciting than trying to grab a free pawn because of a typo. 

cxd4

will update board after you capture the pawn.

I do think you should have traded bishops earlier when you had the chance. That would've weakened my witch more than a piece sac for a couple of pawns. But this is interesting and I didn't anticipate this.

Here's the board now...

17... Nxd4 18. cxd4

18... Qxd4 19. b4

Sorry Ry, I've been busy. Will move tomorrow.

I'm not playing junebug, at least not that I'm aware of.

Did I forget a game?

You have played one game with Junebug:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess960-chess-variants/super-dog-semi-final-captaintugwash-junebug444

19. c5 Bb5

20... cxb4 21. Rd1

22. Qxe5+

I'll just go ahead and assume your next move, by all means make a different one if you prefer!

22... Nxe5 23. Rhe1

23... Rc5 24. Bxd7

If you're still not fully up to date, this should help...

https://www.chess.com/clubs/forum/view/witch-explained

24... Nxd7 25. Rxd7

Not quite useless. It's worth more than a pawn, but probably not two pawns. Meanwhile, the knight is worth three. You're currently four pawns better, but that won't remain the case for long. I think I'm in control of this endgame, otherwise I wouldn't have traded queens.