Sandbox Chess 7/10 Players [The Real One]

Sort:
Avatar of hitthepin

(51,4)

Avatar of HorribleTomato
hitthepin wrote:
HorribleTomato wrote:

How harsh do you think the elimination placement should be? 

Would you rather...

1. Have people immediately getting eliminated after reaching negative health levels

2. Have people get eliminated 3 turns after reaching negative health levels

3. Have people be forced to sell of pieces to keep themselves at positive health levels, killing them when their army runs out of pieces

In the original, option 3 was used. Nav said that pieces were “randomly chosen”, and were worth half their value, if I remember correctly.

Yes, but Nav was too kind. Half value is too much. It's set to 1/3.

Avatar of Bad_Dobby_Fischer
HorribleTomato wrote:
hitthepin wrote:
HorribleTomato wrote:

How harsh do you think the elimination placement should be? 

Would you rather...

1. Have people immediately getting eliminated after reaching negative health levels

2. Have people get eliminated 3 turns after reaching negative health levels

3. Have people be forced to sell of pieces to keep themselves at positive health levels, killing them when their army runs out of pieces

In the original, option 3 was used. Nav said that pieces were “randomly chosen”, and were worth half their value, if I remember correctly.

Yes, but Nav was too kind. Half value is too much. It's set to 1/3.

Tomato will be tomato!

Avatar of HorribleTomato

It's just how I like it. Merciless.

Avatar of JamesAgadir

Bx(50;49) ie my bishop takes the red king. 

Avatar of HorribleTomato

7/8 people have moved.

Waiting for @thegreatauk. Update probably tomorrow.

Avatar of hitthepin

Well, it looks like James is taking charge in this game, just like how he did in the previous one.

Avatar of HorribleTomato

He's the only short term strategist here. According to theory-

Avatar of hitthepin

Hey, you stole my quote. That’s Theory with a capital “T”, and “Short Term” with a capital S and T.

Avatar of winston_weng

Well, he's not gonna live long as I can easily stop his pawn from promoting so he can be ignored

Avatar of HorribleTomato

Changing move to +R(8, 6)

Avatar of HorribleTomato
winston_weng wrote:

Well, he's not gonna live long as I can easily stop his pawn from promoting so he can be ignored

He gets a free 4 energy from the king. He also has a bishop. The pawn isn't the issue.

Avatar of HorribleTomato
hitthepin wrote:

Hey, you stole my quote. That’s Theory with a capital “T”, and “Short Term” with a capital S and T.

Ah. Punctuation is important kids.

Avatar of JamesAgadir

I'm doing a different strategy from the NEISG because I'm not sure how long I'll play or this'll last and I don't want to just push a pawn then have to leave.

Avatar of HorribleTomato

It's working fairly well as well, especially with such an easy target.

Avatar of thegreatauk

P(2,2)

Avatar of HorribleTomato

Submissions locked.

Avatar of HorribleTomato

-Update #5-

@Chess_condor P(9, 3) energy: 8

@William_z +P(50, 1) [-5 energy] energy: 2

@winston_weng P(91, 4) energy: 8

@HorribleTomato +R(8, 6) [-7 energy] energy: 1

@Bad_Dobby_Fischer P(29, 4) energy: 8

@hitthepin P(51, 4) energy: 8

@JamesAgadir Bx(50, 49) [+4 energy] energy: 7

@thegreatauk P(2, 2) energy: 9





Avatar of hitthepin

(51,5)

Are you trying to cut off the promotion rank, Tomato? This is rather uncalled for.

Avatar of JamesAgadir
hitthepin a écrit :

(51,5)

Are you trying to cut off the promotion rank, Tomato? This is rather uncalled for.

Isn't he basically following your ideas.