ROL!
Accuser Takes the Deal
Sort:
Jan 11, 2019
0
#123
He's been trying to get around his mute by creating new accounts, but they've been closed as they've been identified.
Meh can't he just give an apology email or something like that?
Jan 13, 2019
0
#125
He might have had more success if he'd done that than he has creating new accounts.
Jan 17, 2019
0
#126
He was originally muted, and then when he tried to get around it was then banned
Wow, lol, eric is the best ✌️.
Erik*
how is it that this topic-against site rules of naming and shaming-gets so many posts from mods and staff when help and support topics receive so little feedback?
the op, by erik, is an attempt to shame one. no doubt deserved, but, members are not allowed to do it. as this topic has moved on i am dismayed by the posts from mods and staff here that seem to ignore the issues on this site while posting about this singular incident.
consider that the edit and quote functions were not working for about two days. any posts from staff about that? many site issues have been put forth by members, and, they are ignored.
Jan 19, 2019
0
#130
AlCzervik wrote:
consider that the edit and quote functions were not working for about two days. any posts from staff about that?
Staff member @Brenda in https://www.chess.com/forum/view/help-support/cannot-send-any-messages-cannotq-quote-posts?page=2
Jan 19, 2019
0
#131
AlCzervik wrote:
this topic-against site rules of naming and shaming...
the op, by erik, is an attempt to shame one. no doubt deserved, but, members are not allowed to do it...
@erik's the CEO - if he thinks an exception can be made to the site's usual policies in a specific instance, no-one's going to argue with him. I don't see why that's surprising.
Jan 19, 2019
0
#132
AlCzervik wrote:
help and support topics receive so little feedback?
mods and staff... seem to ignore the issues on this site
many site issues have been put forth by members, and, they are ignored.
You need to separate the functions of the moderators and staff here - the mods help apply the site's policies and are mostly volunteers - it's not really their responsibility to answer questions, even though they sometimes do. They don't have any greater insight into what's going on at the development level than ordinary members, and so can't answer those sorts of questions anyway.
The Support team are the staff members who answer enquiries - their primary contact channel is through the "Contact" button reached from the Help --> Ask a Question / Report Abuse / Billing Issues etc. I'm not sure how regularly they hang out in the forums, it's why genuine issues really should be reported by that method. By all means ask about it in the forums: it's often helpful to know if other people have experienced the same problem - but in terms of getting it actioned, a forum thread isn't the most reliable way to bring it to the attention of those who can actually do something about it.
Reporting one issue at a time, with specific examples, is the most helpful way of doing this: putting multiple issues into the one report increases the risk that one of those is going to get lost somewhere along the way, as other issues get resolved.
Yep, Erik's the boss here
Yes
Jan 19, 2019
0
#137
But Lord Business got baited into responding personally, so it counts as a score. 
:)
:D
Jan 20, 2019
0
#140
erik wrote:
Member tacticaltrickyknight starts spouting in ChessTV chat...
TacticalTrickyKnight: erik, in the range 1500-1700 in bullet i've been playing 95% of chessbot user
TacticalTrickyKnight: what are you doing against that?
erik: feel free to report!
erik: I am pretty sure that isn't true. If someone is cheating, they aren't playing at 1500 level
TacticalTrickyKnight: i'm playing 400 bullet game a day over 200 opponent
TacticalTrickyKnight: that's 150 chessbot user
TacticalTrickyKnight: i'm not writing 150+ report unless you pay me
erik: We do monitor. If you aren't happy with it, feel free to report just 3 people. Thank you!
TacticalTrickyKnight: because it's obvious johns, their play is suspicious, when you confront them they either don't even deny it or they insult you
TacticalTrickyKnight: and their profile is full of message claiming they are engine user
TacticalTrickyKnight: and they are
TacticalTrickyKnight: it's impossible otherwise
TacticalTrickyKnight: 1500 player can't smash me in 10 moves in bullet over and over
TacticalTrickyKnight: when i crush 1700 players
TacticalTrickyKnight: i'm not bragging, these are facts they are 80% of engine users around this rating
TacticalTrickyKnight: their monitoring tool can't see anything
erik: Hey TacticalTrickyKnight - I looked at your recent bullet games. Looks like you are winning against all those 95% cheaters. You won 29 of your last 50 games. So... you are smashing all of those cheaters? Fascinating. Tell me more.
TacticalTrickyKnight: look at the last 600 games and make an analysis erik
TacticalTrickyKnight: erik, today i started at 1700 and went to 1595 over 100+ games
erik: You won 50 out of your last 100 games. Sounds about like what is expected.
TacticalTrickyKnight: i told you to do it over 600 games
erik: You just said 100 today
TacticalTrickyKnight: and 50 out of 100 when playing people rated 1650 is a shame for me
erik: Anyway, 100 is statistically significant. You won 1/2 of your games, as expected.
ZephyrXander: erik hitting him with the facts
TacticalTrickyKnight: that's because i kept playing to get my rating back
TacticalTrickyKnight: if i had stopped
TacticalTrickyKnight: it would be 5%
TacticalTrickyKnight: and you refuse to look at them!
erik: I literally just manually counted your games
TacticalTrickyKnight: it's just idk, your monitoring is not good enough
erik: I just looked at 200 more of your games and you won in more than 50%.
JonUrra: erik is just owning that guy, haha
TacticalTrickyKnight: you're not listening to what i said erik
M8in28: hahaha i think eric is just making numbers up now
erik: Please don't come in hear and spread fake news about your situation. I looked at 300 of your games. You won more than half.
erik: Feel free to count them like I did: https://www.chess.com/games/archive?show=live_lightning&;username=tacticaltrickyknight&gameType=live&rated=rated&gameOwner=other_game&gameTypeslive%5B0%5D=bullet&gameTypes%5B0%5D=blitz&gameTypes%5B1%5D=standard&gameTypes%5B2%5D=lightning&gameTypes%5B3%5D=bullet&gameTypes%5B4%5D=daily&gameTypes%5B5%5D=rapid&page=6
M8in28: you went from 200- 300 games in 1 second
erik: I graduated from college, M8in28. I can count green squares pretty quickly.
TacticalTrickyKnight: now i'm just thinking like the others that you are making the numbers up
TacticalTrickyKnight: that's the truth
erik: Ok TacticalTrickyKnight - let's put your money where your mouth is. If, over the last 300 games, you have lost more than 50%, I will give you a lifetime diamond membership. If you are wrong, I close your account. Deal?
TacticalTrickyKnight: lol
M8in28: take it
soupram: erik pulling out all his cards
JohnHS: Do it, Erik
juveleu76: LOL@ erik
jspicher: please erik, do it!
JohnHS: Time to investigate, Erik
M8in28: no if you win more than 50% he's gonna close your account
TacticalTrickyKnight: he is talking about previous played games i assume
jspicher: trickyknight, yeah can't you read? He said he'd look at our last 300 played
erik: Your last 300 games, ok? Deal? Lifetime membership, or your account gets closed?
erik: If you have LOST more than 50%
M8in28: i'd take that deal
jspicher: trickyknight, don't wuss out -- take the damn deal
TacticalTrickyKnight: lol you didn't specify that my account would be closed if that's not the case
erik: If you are going to come in here and make accusations, then stand up for them.
TacticalTrickyKnight: i am
erik: OK. So you take the deal?
TacticalTrickyKnight: no, i didn't know you wanted to close the account if this isn't true and i don't know about the numbers for sure
erik: I'll check your last 300 games. If you have lost more than 50% of them, you get lifetime membership. If you have NOT lost more than 50%, then your account gets closed. Deal?
JohnHS: Take it, Tactical
JohnHS: Are you backing down?
TacticalTrickyKnight: ok erik
TacticalTrickyKnight: deal
erik: OK!
nhallowell02: lets goooo
erik: Starting with this: https://i.imgur.com/bo3qHwK.png
Juancris: nice seeing you tactiltrickyknight
You can count the games here: https://www.chess.com/games/archive?show=live_lightning&username=tacticaltrickyknight&gameType=live&rated=rated&gameOwner=other_game&gameTypeslive%5B0%5D=bullet&gameTypes%5B0%5D=blitz&gameTypes%5B1%5D=standard&gameTypes%5B2%5D=lightning&gameTypes%5B3%5D=bullet&gameTypes%5B4%5D=daily&gameTypes%5B5%5D=rapid
Page 1 - 29 wins, 1 draw, 20 losses
Page 2 - 21 wins, 2 draws, 27 losses
Page 3 - 19 wins, 3 wins, 28 losses
Page 4 - 24 wins, 0 draws, 26 losses
Page 5 - 30 wins, 3 draws, 17 losses
Page 6 - 28 wins, 0 draws, 22 losses
That's 140 losses out of 300 games. 9 draws. 151 wins.
Instead of closing his account, he's permanently muted.
Don't spread fake news.
TL/DR
LOL
~ 
E on point!