Coincidence: I just posted in the openings forum about 100 topplayers who faced 1. c4 f5 2. Nf3 with black. No one (!) played 2. ...e5 and I wonder why.
Now I stumble over this topic of yours I remember your name was on that list of 100 topplayers and I can ask the question directly:
Spoelman- Pruijssers 2017 (0-1), did you consider 2. ...e5 and if not, why not?
Hello AttaChess68, that game brings me back. I did consider 2...e5, but then it makes more sense to play 1...e5 against 1.c4, with 2.Nc3 f5 as the most likely follow-up. The point of 1...f5 is to aim for a Dutch type of position.
Hi