Can you beat an Alien 👽 at chess
Sort:
Games4life1
Feb 6, 2025
0
#301
I agree bruh😨🤔
Why are you guys all acting like your experts on all the different species of aliens 😭
i don’t think aliens could be bothered with chess so i am confident of beating the lot of them in a simultaneous exhibition.
Feb 7, 2025
0
#305
bobcat7ko wrote:
OperationalPrudence wrote:
bobcat7ko wrote:
absolutely they just need some xplaztto to drink and I'll win easy as that
What is xplaztto? Is that like a laxative 🤣
something like that, I mean you can ask the government for details
I'm not getting abducted by the FBI over a chess game
Feb 7, 2025
0
#306
A game against Species 8472 would be terrifying. They play as humanoids but If I lose they revert back to original form and slice me in half á la Starship Troopers.
A GM playing a Borg drone would be a good match but knowing what bad losers the Borg are they would assimilate or kill everyone if they start losing which would spoil the tournament for all the less psychotic species taking part.
Feb 7, 2025
0
#309
long_quach wrote:
OperationalPrudence wrote:
@long_quach What AI engine are you using?
Law.
Can you articulate why you suspect I am using some kind of AI engine?
Pretend this as a courtroom.
Before you accuse someone of something, you have to articulate exactly why you are making that accusation.
If you don't understand law, I have a recommendation for you. It's on my bookshelf. It can be on your bookshelf too.
Everybody's Guide to Law
Melvin M. Belli
ISBN-13 : 978-0151293865
Proof I read it.
My book was distributed by Crown books, which also owned Trak Auto and Rite Aid. They went out of business.
"Books cost too much." - Crown books commercial.
You cannot get my version anymore, except maybe on Ebay.
dude you already answered that question... are you forgetful?
Feb 7, 2025
0
#310
long_quach wrote:
OperationalPrudence wrote:
@long_quach What AI engine are you using?
Law.
Can you articulate why you suspect I am using some kind of AI engine?
Pretend this as a courtroom.
Before you accuse someone of something, you have to articulate exactly why you are making that accusation.
If you don't understand law, I have a recommendation for you. It's on my bookshelf. It can be on your bookshelf too.
Everybody's Guide to Law
Melvin M. Belli
ISBN-13 : 978-0151293865
Proof I read it.
My book was distributed by Crown books, which also owned Trak Auto and Rite Aid. They went out of business.
"Books cost too much." - Crown books commercial.
You cannot get my version anymore, except maybe on Ebay.
THIS ISN'T EVEN ABOUT CHESS ANYMORE
Feb 7, 2025
0
#312
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
dude you already answered that question... are you forgetful?
His answer does not articulate his reason of suspicion.
I mean YOU as in "long_quach" have already answered the question that he asked about you using AI.
Feb 7, 2025
0
#315
thebroski555 wrote:
I'm about to crash out on this forum
let it all out
Feb 7, 2025
0
#316
long_quach wrote:
thebroski555 wrote:
THIS IS NOT COURT THIS IS A CHESS FORUM
Law is about fairness.
Fairness is applicable everywhere.
ok true
Feb 7, 2025
0
#317
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
dude you already answered that question... are you forgetful?
His answer does not articulate his reason of suspicion.
I mean YOU as in "long_quach" have already answered the question that he asked about you using AI.
I answered his question.
He did not answer my question.
what question are you referring to? you responded to his question of using AI twice...
Feb 7, 2025
0
#318
StandStarter wrote:
thebroski555 wrote:
I'm about to crash out on this forum
let it all out
Too busy switching from 2 different forums that have such active people i'm forced to binge
Feb 7, 2025
0
#319
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
dude you already answered that question... are you forgetful?
His answer does not articulate his reason of suspicion.
I mean YOU as in "long_quach" have already answered the question that he asked about you using AI.
I answered his question.
He did not answer my question.
what question are you referring to? you responded to his question of using AI twice...
My question is:
Why does he suspect that I'm using AI to begin with?
I want him to articulate his suspicion.
heres your answer. he answered it previously