Colby-Covington wrote:
So @sir-foxy has been identified as llama. Perfect.
Yeah he's been basically referring to "I" now...
The Most Average Members In The Community - The Average Joes
Sort:
Jun 19, 2020
0
#184
Sir-Foxy wrote:
Yeah, but someone pretending to be llama would do the same right?
no.
The 2200 are the one factor that undoubtedly makes you none other than llama. No known troll is capable of hitting it. The speed with which you reached 2100 is already all I need to know, regarding how long it would take you to hit 2200.
Jun 19, 2020
0
#187
Thanks man.
Check out this sacrifice.
I was mad at myself because I played this opening earlier that day and screwed it up, and then in this game I didn't play the variation I had prepared. I suddenly decided fk it, I'm going to sacrifice whether it works or not... and it worked and it was pretty cool.
Definitely a legit sac, nice. Did you just suddenly notice that without expecting or at least knowing about that possibility at all? For a 3min game that was impressive. I'd probably not be able to find that without having carefully prepared it first. That's why I always like to be up on time, because I am very bad at finding moves under time pressure myself.
Jun 19, 2020
0
#189
Yeah right, you've done similar sacs, don't be so complimentary.
I've done Nxf7 with Qxe6+ before, sure, but I had no followup in mind after that... and after he played Kf8 I suddenly saw Bg6... and then my opponent resigned, so it was pretty fun.
HI
Jun 19, 2020
0
#195
Sir-Foxy wrote:
50 is a lot.
Well I mean how could I miss the 47th French Thematic, even though I don't play it!?
And I need more practice with Queen's gambit
As a former Grunfeld defense player, I was intrigued by the Russian System
HELLO GUYES
Jun 19, 2020
0
#198
Arihant2016 wrote:
This is getting ridiculus, you cant just spam a single link in every forum to desperately get people to look at your miserable blog
So @sir-foxy has been identified as llama. Perfect.